Cited by 21Dental Health and Care UtilizationOral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Research and COVID-19

Effectiveness of a motivational–behavioural skills protocol for oral hygiene among patients with hyposalivation

López‐Jornet, Pia, Fabio, Camacho‐Alonso, Consuelo, Rodríguez Agudo, Paz, Andujar Mateos·2014·Gerodontology

Abstract

Background: The main objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a motivational‐behavioural skills protocol for plaque control in patients with hyposalivation. Patients and methods: In a randomised, evaluator‐blinded, controlled trial, 60 subjects with hyposalivation (12 men and 48 women) were randomly assigned to two groups: the control group received basic oral hygiene instruction, while for the study (intervention) group, oral hygiene instruction was based on cognitive behavioural principles and motivational interviewing (MI). Both groups were given oral hygiene instruction once every 15 days, with a total of four sessions over a 2‐month period: plaque extension and community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN), frequency and duration of brushing, frequency of interdental cleaning and scores based on scale of ‘self‐efficacy for brushing of the teeth’. Clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Results: Both control and intervention group patients showed significantly lower plaque indices, bleeding indices and an improvement in probe depth after the 2‐month study period. Interproximal brushing was significantly more frequent among the intervention group (p = 0.016). Conclusion: In patients with hyposalivation, the application of oral hygiene instruction based on cognitive principles and MI offers benefits for periodontal health. Longer‐term studies are needed to confirm these results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ger.12037

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
López‐Jornet, P., Fabio, C., Consuelo, R. A., & Paz, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Oral Medicine Murcia University Dental School Murcia Spain
  • Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Venue
Gerodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-09
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
288-295
ISSN
  • 0734-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2358
OpenAlex
W2140135949
Cited by
21
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gerodontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
hyposalivation, dental hygiene education, motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy, plaque control, periodontal health, interdental cleaning, dental plaque, bleeding on probing, older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Devices, Home Care, Dental Plaque Index, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Index, Periodontal Pocket, Saliva, Self Concept, Toothbrushing, Xerostomia, Health Behavior, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method, Self Efficacy, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review