Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a simple screening test for sarcopenia in older adults

Ishii, Shinya, Tanaka, Tomoki, Shibasaki, Koji, Ouchi, Yasuyoshi, Kikutani, Takeshi, Higashiguchi, Takashi, Obuchi, Shuichi P, Ishikawa‐Takata, Kazuko, Hirano, Hirohiko, Kawai, Hisashi, Tsuji, Tetsuo, Iijima, Katsuya·2014·Geriatrics & Gerontology International

Abstract

Aim: To develop a simple screening test to identify older adults at high risk for sarcopenia. Methods: We studied 1971 functionally independent, community‐dwelling adults aged 65 years or older randomly selected from the resident register of K ashiwa city, C hiba, J apan. Data collection was carried out between S eptember and N ovember 2012. Sarcopenia was defined based on low muscle mass measured by bioimpedance analysis and either low muscle strength characterized by handgrip or low physical performance characterized by slow gait speed. Results: The prevalence of sarcopenia was 14.2% in men and 22.1% in women. After the variable selection procedure, the final model to estimate the probability of sarcopenia included three variables: age, grip strength and calf circumference. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, a measure of discrimination, of the final model was 0.939 with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.918–0.958 for men, and 0.909 with 95% CI of 0.887–0.931 for women. We created a score chart for each sex based on the final model. When the sum of sensitivity and specificity was maximized, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for sarcopenia were 84.9%, 88.2%, 54.4%, and 97.2% for men, 75.5%, 92.0%, 72.8%, and 93.0% for women, respectively. Conclusions: The presence of sarcopenia could be detected using three easily obtainable variables with high accuracy. The screening test we developed could help identify functionally independent older adults with sarcopenia who are good candidates for intervention. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2014; 14 (Suppl. 1): 93–101.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ggi.12197

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ishii, S., Tanaka, T., Shibasaki, K., Ouchi, Y., Kikutani, T., Higashiguchi, T., Obuchi, S. P., Ishikawa‐Takata, K., Hirano, H., Kawai, H., Tsuji, T., & Iijima, K.
Venue
Geriatrics & Gerontology International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-23
Volume
14
Issue
S1
Pages
93-101
ISSN
  • 1444-1586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0594
OpenAlex
W1550906365
Cited by
384
References
8
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.