Cited by 25Migraine and Headache StudiesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTraumatic Brain Injury Research

A nursing intervention increases quality of life and self-efficacy in migraine: a 1-year prospective controlled trial

Leroux, Elizabeth, Beaudet, Line, Boudreau, Guy, Eghtesadi, Marzieh, Marchand, Luc, Pim, Heather, Chagnon, Miguel·2018·Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the impact of a combined nursing and medical approach to a medical follow-up only on headache outcomes, quality of life, and self-efficacy in a cohort of migraineurs. BACKGROUND: Interdisciplinary approaches have been proposed for migraine management. A nursing intervention could improve patient outcomes. METHODS: We prospectively studied new patients referred to our tertiary headache center for migraine. The control group was followed by a physician; the active group was also followed by a nurse with a personalized intervention including adaptation of the lifestyle. RESULTS: Two hundred patients (176 women and 24 men, mean age 40 years old) were included and classified according to headache frequency. Each group was followed for 12 months with daily headache diaries. One hundred and sixty-two completed the study. There were no significant differences between groups for the decrease in headache days, the percent of chronic patients reverting to episodic status or the cessation of medication overuse. Patients in the control group were more likely to find a successful prophylaxis (55.6 vs 27.7%, P = .002). Despite this, the mean decrease in HIT-6 scores at month 8 was 5.23 ± 9.18 for the active group compared with a decrease of 2.10 ± 9.27 for the control group (P = .030, clinically significant difference of 3.13). Headache Management Self-Efficacy Scale (HMSE) scores, representing the feeling of self-efficacy, increased by 14.35 ± 18.41 for the active group vs 4.69 ± 21.22 in the control group (P = .002). CONCLUSION: A nursing intervention can lower the impact of migraines on the patient's life. The improvement in the HIT-6 score in this study was correlated with improvements in self-efficacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/head.13178

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leroux, E., Beaudet, L., Boudreau, G., Eghtesadi, M., Marchand, L., Pim, H., & Chagnon, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Calgary Alberta Canada
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal QC Canada
Venue
Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-15
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
260-274
ISSN
  • 0017-8748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4610
OpenAlex
W2754316275
Cited by
25
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Allergan (160000)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
migraine, nursing interventions, quality of life, self-efficacy, headache treatment, lifestyle adaptation, migraine prophylaxis, medication overuse, chronic migraine, multidisciplinary care, HIT-6
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Headache, Humans, Male, Migraine Disorders, Nursing Care, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Risk Reduction Behavior, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review