Cited by 9Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchDisability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Health promotion and intellectual disability: listening to men

Open access
Bollard, Martin·2017·Health & Social Care in the Community

Abstract

Taking responsibility for your own health has been a central tenet of public health policy internationally for a number of decades. Governments in the UK and internationally continue to promote a plethora of health promotion strategies, encouraging individuals and communities to adopt healthy lifestyle choices. Although it is widely recognised that men are not as proactive in seeking out medical help or taking on health promotion advice as women, limited gender-sensitive research exists in the field of intellectual disability. Despite many health promotion policy and practice strategies targeted at this population, little research exists exploring whether men with intellectual disability acknowledge health promotion advice. The study aimed to explore how men with mild-to-moderate intellectual disability understood and perceived their health and what health promotion messages they acted upon. The study was based on a participatory approach which enabled 11 men with intellectual disability to contribute as steering group members and as participants through one-to-one interviews. Data were collected between September 2011 and July 2012. Thematic analysis was undertaken. The participants demonstrated a capacity to understand their own health. This was inclusive of a concern about associating being obese with being unhealthy. The participants reported good relationships with their general practitioners (GPs) and felt valued, in particular when the GP was prepared to offer specific intellectual disability and health promotion advice. More gendered research inclusive of the views of this male population is required and the study reiterates the importance of promoting the health of men and women with intellectual disability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/hsc.12291

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Baur C. (2007) Health Literacy and Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Achieving Accessible Information and Services. Paper presented at the State of Science in Ageing with Developmental Disabilities Symposium, Atlanta, GA.
  2. Beange H., McElduff A. & Baker W. (1995) Medical disor- ders of adults with mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation 99 (6), 595-604.
  3. Conradt M., Dierk J.M. & Schlumberger E.R. (2008) Obesity, related coping and its association with shame, guilt and weight loss. Journal of Clinical Psychology 64 (10), 1129-1144.
  4. Department of Health (2012) Strengthening the Commitment: The Report of the UK Modernizing Learning Disability Nurs- ing Review. HMSO, London.
  5. Kent A. (2008) Improving acute care for people with learn- ing disabilities. Nursing Times 104 (5), 32-34.
  6. Marks B. & Sisirak J. (2014) Health promotion and people with intellectual disabilities chapter 2. In: L. Taggart & W. Cousins (Eds) Health Promotion for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, pp. 17-31. Open University Press, Maidenhead.
  7. Parker E. (2010) The Meaning and Significance of Siblings and Peer Relationships by Young People Looked after by Local Authority. Unpublished PhD Thesis. School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry.
  8. Payne S. (2006) The Health of Men and Women. Polity Press, Cambridge.
  9. Ritchie J., Spencer L. & O'Connor W. (2003) Carrying out qualitative analyses. In: J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds) Qualita- tive Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students, pp. 78-90. Sage, London.
  10. Robertson J., Roberts H. & Emerson E. (2013) Health Checks for People with Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review of Evidence Learning Disability. Observatory DH, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bollard, M.
Affiliations
Coventry (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Bollard, Martin
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Published
2015-10-04
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
185-193
ISSN
0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178133115
Cited by
9
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Advocacy Organisation Coventry
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
intellectual disability, men with intellectual disabilities, health promotion, health perception, general practitioners, obesity, participatory research, health-seeking behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Physician-Patient Relations, Sex Factors, Men's Health, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review