Cited by 40ICT in Developing CommunitiesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsSocial Media in Health Education

Community health workers’ experiences of using video teaching tools during home visits—a pilot study

Open access
Coetzee, Bronwyné, Kohrman, Hannah, Tomlinson, Mark, Mbewu, Nokwanele, Le Roux, Ingrid, Adam, Maya·2018·Health & Social Care in the Community

Abstract

Innovations in health, such as the use of tablet computers, show promise in broadening the scope of work of community health workers (CHWs), and play an important role in keeping CHWs and their clients up to date with advancements in health. While the use of mobile phones and tablets is innovative, the applicability of these technologies in different contexts remains poorly understood. Furthermore, little is known about the acceptability and feasibility of the use of video teaching tools on such devices across diverse contexts. In this study, we aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of using tablets with teaching videos (about HIV, alcohol, nutrition and breastfeeding) to support the health promotion efforts of 24 CHWs who work with pregnant mothers and mothers of young children in an urban township in South Africa. Between November 2015 and May 2016, we conducted focus groups and identified four key themes (with several sub-themes) that demonstrated factors related to the acceptability and feasibility of these devices and their content. Focus group transcripts were analysed thematically using qualitative data analysis software. The findings indicated that while the devices contained several supportive features (such as lightening the workload, and stimulating interest in their work), they also contained several restrictive features (safety and confidentiality). CHWs considered the video content an important tool to engage not only their clients but also family members and the community at large. Issues surrounding safety, privacy and confidentiality of using these devices require careful consideration prior to implementation in large-scale studies. Furthermore, stigma associated with household visits by CHWs and the nature of their work also need to be addressed by researchers and programme implementers. Overall, CHWs deemed the devices and the video content an acceptable and feasible means with which to provide health promotion and education among their clients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/hsc.12488

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coetzee et al. [51] report concerns of safety in a Cape Town township for community healthcare workers who carry devices.

    “Coetzee et al. [51] report concerns of safety in a Cape Town township for community healthcare workers who carry devices.”

    From A user-centred design framework for mHealth (2020) · cites this paper as [51]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coetzee, B., Kohrman, H., Tomlinson, M., Mbewu, N., Le Roux, I., & Adam, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of PsychologyStellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • Philani MaternalChild Health and Nutrition Project Elonwabeni Cape Town South Africa
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-05
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
167-175
ISSN
  • 0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2524
OpenAlex
W2751475837
Cited by
40
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Stanford University School of Medicine
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
community health workers, tablet computers, mobile health, home visits, acceptability, feasibility, health promotion, HIV education, alcohol education, nutrition education, breastfeeding education, pregnant women, mothers of young children, confidentiality, stigma, urban townships, South Africa
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Community Health Workers, Female, Health Promotion, House Calls, Humans, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, South Africa, Focus Groups, Telemedicine, Qualitative Research, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review