Cited by 21Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and research

Quality home care for persons living with dementia: Personal support workers' perspectives in Ontario, Canada

Open access
Breen, Rachel, Savundranayagam, Marie Y., Orange, Joseph B., Kothari, Anita·2022·Health & Social Care in the Community

Abstract

There is a global need to understand how the quality of home care for persons living with dementia is perceived by their most frequent formal caregivers, personal support workers (PSW), especially given the expected rise in the prevalence of dementia. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of PSW regarding what constitutes quality home care for persons with dementia. Qualitative content analysis was undertaken to interpret semi-structured interviews with PSW (N = 15). Study findings indicate that quality home care is perceived to be (1) person-centered; (2) provided by PSW with dementia-specific education and training; (3) facilitated by specific PSW experiences, abilities and characteristics; (4) enhanced by accessible information, services and education for persons with dementia and their caregivers; (5) provided by an inclusive dementia care team; and (6) facilitated by organisational supports and respect. However, findings also indicated differences in what PSW perceive as quality home care versus what they are experiencing when providing care for persons with dementia. Participants advocated for increased supports to them through ongoing dementia-specific education and training, increased teamwork among care providers, increased wages, sufficient and qualified staffing, and increased exchange of client information. The findings highlight the importance of exploring front-line workers' perspectives and how they can help revise current healthcare policies and inform future policy development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/hsc.13692

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is limited literature exploring challenges of scheduling consistency for PSWs in home care delivery and pressures this causes for delivering high-quality care.

    “Despite critical issues of delivering continuity of care, there is limited literature exploring challenges of scheduling consistency for PSWs in home care delivery and pressures this causes for delivering high-quality care [10, 42].”

    From The hospital-to-home care transition experience of home care clients: an exploratory study using patient journey mapping (2023) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says inadequate resources have caused timing, scheduling and continuity-of-care challenges, and the Findings (page unavailable) link consistent PSW assignments to quality care. But the paper identifies a literature gap concerning PSWs’ perspectives on quality dementia home care, not a shortage of literature on scheduling consistency specifically; it cites previous work on scheduling challenges. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kitwood, T. M. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  2. Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities. (2014). Personal support worker program standard (pp. 1-59). http://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/ pepg/audie nces/colle ges/progs tan/healt h/41469.pdf [last ac- cessed 12 November 2019].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Breen, R., Savundranayagam, M. Y., Orange, J. B., & Kothari, A.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Savundranayagam, Marie Y.
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-12-23
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
e2497-e2506
ISSN
  • 0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2524
OpenAlex
W4200534922
Cited by
21
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
dementia care, home care, personal support workers, quality of care, person-centred care, caregiver education, dementia care team, organizational support, staffing, worker wages, Ontario
MeSH terms
Dementia, Home Care Services, Humans, Ontario, Quality of Health Care, Caregivers, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review