The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TESTING FOR MULTIPLE BUBBLES: HISTORICAL EPISODES OF EXUBERANCE AND COLLAPSE IN THE S&P 500
Open accessAbstract
Recent work on econometric detection mechanisms has shown the effectiveness of recursive procedures in identifying and dating financial bubbles in real time. These procedures are useful as warning alerts in surveillance strategies conducted by central banks and fiscal regulators with real‐time data. Use of these methods over long historical periods presents a more serious econometric challenge due to the complexity of the nonlinear structure and break mechanisms that are inherent in multiple‐bubble phenomena within the same sample period. To meet this challenge, this article develops a new recursive flexible window method that is better suited for practical implementation with long historical time series. The method is a generalized version of the sup augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) test of Phillips et al. (“Explosive behavior in the 1990s NASDAQ: When did exuberance escalate asset values?” International Economic Review 52 (2011), 201–26; PWY) and delivers a consistent real‐time date‐stamping strategy for the origination and termination of multiple bubbles. Simulations show that the test significantly improves discriminatory power and leads to distinct power gains when multiple bubbles occur. An empirical application of the methodology is conducted on S&P 500 stock market data over a long historical period from January 1871 to December 2010. The new approach successfully identifies the well‐known historical episodes of exuberance and collapses over this period, whereas the strategy of PWY and a related cumulative sum (CUSUM) dating procedure locate far fewer episodes in the same sample range.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing for a unit root in time series regression
PHILLIPS, P. C. B., & PERRON, P. (1988) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/75.2.335 · Cited by 19,155
Self-citationFurther Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis
Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (2002) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/073500102753410372 · Cited by 5,737
Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) Processes
Phillips, P. C. B., & Hansen, B. E. (1990) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297545 · Cited by 4,909
Self-citationThe Dividend-Price Ratio and Expectations of Future Dividends and Discount Factors
Campbell, J. Y., & Shiller, R. J. (1988) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/1.3.195 · Cited by 3,774
Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order
SAID, S. E., & DICKEY, D. A. (1984) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/71.3.599 · Cited by 3,418
Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises
Romansco, A. U., & Kindleberger, C. P. (1979) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1855147 · Cited by 2,838
Time Series Regression with a Unit Root
Phillips, P. C. B. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913237 · Cited by 2,814
Self-citationThe Dividend-Price Ratio and Expectations of Future Dividends and Discount Factors
Campbell, J., & Shiller, R. (1986) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w2100 · Cited by 2,425
Stock Return Predictability: Is it There?
Ang, A., & Bekaert, G. (2007) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhl021 · Cited by 1,295
Pitfalls and Opportunities: What Macroeconomists Should Know about Unit Roots
Campbell, J. Y., & Perron, P. (1991) · NBER Macroeconomics Annual · doi:10.1086/654163 · Cited by 1,255
Cited by
RETRACTED: Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis
Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2019) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2018.09.003 · Cited by 1,172
RetractedTESTING FOR MULTIPLE BUBBLES: LIMIT THEORY OF REAL‐TIME DETECTORS
Phillips, P. C. B., Shi, S., & Yu, J. (2015) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/iere.12131 · Cited by 478
Self-citationCheung, A. (.-K., Roca, E., & Su, J.-J. (2015) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2015.1005827 · Cited by 368
Co-explosivity in the cryptocurrency market
Bouri, E., Shahzad, S. J. H., & Roubaud, D. (2019) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2018.07.005 · Cited by 366
ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE WITH NEAR UNIT ROOTS
Phillips, P. C. B. (2023) · Econometric Theory · doi:10.1017/s0266466622000342 · Cited by 44
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, P. C. B., Shi, S., & Yu, J.
- Venue
- International Economic Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-28
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1043-1078
- ISSN
- 0020-6598 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2354
- OpenAlex
- W3125260748
- Cited by
- 1,118
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 155.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TESTING FOR MULTIPLE BUBBLES: HISTORICAL EPISODES OF EXUBERANCE AND COLLAPSE IN THE S&P 500. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/iere.12132
- The paper
- Phillips, P. C. B., Shi, S., & Yu, J. (2015). TESTING FOR MULTIPLE BUBBLES: HISTORICAL EPISODES OF EXUBERANCE AND COLLAPSE IN THE S&P 500. International Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.