Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Denosumab: mechanism of action and clinical outcomes

Open access
Hanley, D. A., Adachi, J. D., Bell, A., Brown, V.·2012·International Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract

AIMS: To describe the mechanisms of action of denosumab, a novel antiresorptive agent, contrasting it with other antiresorptive and anabolic osteoporosis treatments. METHODS: Published papers related to the mechanism of action of approved osteoporosis treatments were sought through MEDLINE searches. FINDINGS: Osteoporotic fractures carry a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality, but pharmacotherapy can prevent such fractures in high-risk individuals. Antiresorptive drugs (e.g. bisphosphonates, oestrogen, denosumab) reduce bone turnover by distinct mechanisms. Denosumab, a recently approved therapy, is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds the cytokine RANKL (receptor activator of NFκB ligand), an essential factor initiating bone turnover. RANKL inhibition blocks osteoclast maturation, function and survival, thus reducing bone resorption. In contrast, bisphosphonates bind bone mineral, where they are absorbed by mature osteoclasts, inducing osteoclast apoptosis and suppressing resorption. These differences in mechanism influence both the onset and reversibility of treatment. DISCUSSION: Effective pharmacotherapy is necessary for patients at high risk of fracture. Among the treatment options for postmenopausal osteoporosis, there are significant differences in mechanism and dosing. Denosumab acts by a novel mechanism and is administered twice yearly by subcutaneous injection. Identified by Osteoporosis Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines as a first-line agent for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, denosumab represents an important addition to our treatment options.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijcp.12022

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Hanley, D. A., Adachi, J. D., Bell, A., & Brown, V.
Venue
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Published
2012-09-12
Volume
66
Issue
12
Pages
1139-1146
ISSN
  • 1368-5031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-1241
OpenAlex
W1621696727
Cited by
377
References
51
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Denosumab: mechanism of action and clinical outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ijcp.12022
The paper
Hanley, D. A., Adachi, J. D., Bell, A., & Brown, V. (2012). Denosumab: mechanism of action and clinical outcomes. International Journal of Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12022

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.