Cited by 147Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Home telemonitoring effectiveness in COPD: a systematic review.

Open access
Cruz, J., Brooks, D., Marques, A.·2014·International Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide a systematic review of the effectiveness of home telemonitoring to reduce healthcare utilisation and improve health-related outcomes of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: An electronic literature search in Medline, Embase, B-on and Web of Science was conducted from June to August 2012 and updated until July 2013, using the following keywords: [tele(-)monitoring or tele(-)health or tele(-)homecare or tele(-)care or tele-home health or home monitoring] and [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or COPD]. Randomised and non-randomised controlled trials evaluating home telemonitoring interventions in COPD were included. A meta-analysis using risk ratio (RR) and standardised mean difference (SMD) was conducted for healthcare utilisation (hospitalisations, length of stay, emergency department visits) and associated costs, and health-related outcomes [mortality, exacerbations and health-related quality of life (HRQOL)]. RESULTS: Nine articles were included. Significant differences were found for hospitalisation rates (RR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.53-0.98; p = 0.034); however, no differences in the other healthcare utilisation outcomes were observed. There was a trend to reduced healthcare costs in the telemonitoring group. In two studies, this intervention was associated with a reduced number of exacerbations (p < 0.05) and a significant increase in HRQOL (SMD = -0.53; 95% CI = -0.97- -0.09; p = 0.019). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Home telemonitoring appears to have a positive effect in reducing respiratory exacerbations and hospitalisations and improving quality of life. However, the evidence of its benefits is still limited and further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of home telemonitoring in COPD management, as there are still few studies in this area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijcp.12345

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]22. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG, on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2008). Analy- sing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Hig- gins JP, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions -Cochrane Book Series. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. [23]23. Sterne JAC, Becker BJ, Egger M. The funnel plot. In: Rothstein H, Sutton A, Borenstein M, eds. Pub- lication Bias in Meta-analysis: Prevention, Assess- ment and Adjustments. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2005: 75-98.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cruz, J., Brooks, D., & Marques, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Marques, A.
Venue
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Published
2014-01-28
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
369-378
ISSN
1368-5031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985303908
Cited by
147
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Funda��o para a Ci�ncia e Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/81328/2011)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
home health monitoring, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, health care utilization, hospitalization, health care costs, respiratory exacerbations, health-related quality of life, telemedicine, COPD management
MeSH terms
Emergency Service, Hospital, Home Care Services, Hospitalization, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Quality of Life, Recurrence, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Telemedicine, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review