Cited by 82Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentBariatric Surgery and OutcomesDiabetes Treatment and Management

Effectiveness and tolerability of orlistat and liraglutide in patients with obesity in a real‐world setting: The XENSOR Study

Open access
Gorgojo‐Martínez, Juan J., Basagoiti‐Carreño, Belen, Sanz‐Velasco, Alberto, Serrano‐Moreno, Clara, Almodóvar‐Ruiz, Francisca·2019·International Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate in a real-world setting the effectiveness of two drugs, orlistat and liraglutide, in patients with overweight or obesity and insufficient weight loss (WL) after a lifestyle modification programme. METHODS: with at least a weight-related comorbidity who had failed to lose at least 5% of their weight after 6 months of lifestyle modification. The co-primary end-points, assessed at 3-6 months and at the end of the follow-up, were weight change from baseline, proportion of patients who lost at least 5% of their baseline weight and adjusted differences in WL between both drugs. RESULTS: Five hundred patients, 400 in the group of orlistat (age 47.0, weight 107.8 kg) and 100 in the group of liraglutide (age 51.9 years, weight 105.1 kg), were included. Treatment with both drugs significantly reduced weight, fasting plasma glucose, systolic BP, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and alanine transaminase over a median follow-up period of 7 months. WL with liraglutide (-7.7 kg) was significantly greater than that observed with orlistat (-3.3 kg), and more individuals lost at least 5% of their baseline weight with liraglutide (64.7%) than with orlistat (27.4%). Rates of prediabetes significantly decreased with liraglutide in comparison to orlistat. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, liraglutide showed a greater effectiveness in WL compared with orlistat and improved several obesity-associated metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijcp.13399

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An open-label trial showed that combining liraglutide with orlistat had greater efficacy than orlistat alone, though gains over liraglutide monotherapy were marginal.

    “An open-label trial showed greater efficacy than orlistat alone, though gains over liraglutide monotherapy were marginal [188].”

    From Precision obesity medicine: A phenotype-guided framework for pharmacologic therapy across the lifespan (2025) · cites this paper as [188]

    The Methods and Results describe a retrospective observational study with separate orlistat and liraglutide groups, not an open-label trial of the two drugs combined. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports greater weight loss with liraglutide alone than with orlistat; it provides no comparison between combination treatment and liraglutide monotherapy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The majority of real-world studies conducted in patients initiating incretin-based anti-obesity medications were retrospective and included liraglutide users, while only a few studies investigated semaglutide titrated up to 2.4 mg.

    “The majority of RWS conducted in patients initiating incretin-based AOM were retrospective51–71 and included liraglutide users, while only a few studies investigated semaglutide titrated up to 2.4 mg65,66,69–71 (Tables 1 and 2).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gorgojo‐Martínez, J. J., Basagoiti‐Carreño, B., Sanz‐Velasco, A., Serrano‐Moreno, C., & Almodóvar‐Ruiz, F.
Affiliations
  • Unit of Endocrinology and Nutrition Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón Madrid Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-19
Volume
73
Issue
11
Pages
e13399-e13399
ISSN
  • 1368-5031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-1241
OpenAlex
W2967788962
Cited by
82
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
orlistat, liraglutide, obesity, weight loss, real-world effectiveness, tolerability, prediabetes, cardiovascular risk factors, metabolic risk factors, weight-related comorbidities
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Orlistat, Adult, Female, Humans, Lactones, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Weight Loss, Anti-Obesity Agents, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review