Cited by 118Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsSkin Protection and AgingToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

The banned sunscreen ingredients and their impact on human health: a systematic review

Open access
Suh, Susie, Pham, Christine, Smith, Janellen, Mesinkovska, Natasha A.·2020·International Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Recent evidence of high systemic absorption of sunscreen ingredients has raised concerns regarding the safety of sunscreen products. Oxybenzone (BP‐3) and octinoxate (OMC), two common sunscreen ingredients, were recently banned in Key West and Hawaii owing to their toxic effects on marine ecosystems. Their impact on human health requires a careful assessment. To summarize the current evidence on the association between the systemic level of BP‐3 or OMC and its health impact, a primary literature search was conducted using PubMed database in February 2019. There are 29 studies that address the impact of these ingredients on human health. Studies show that elevated systemic level of BP‐3 has no adverse effect on male and female fertility, female reproductive hormone level, adiposity, fetal growth, child's neurodevelopment, and sexual maturation. However, the association of BP‐3 level on thyroid hormone, testosterone level, kidney function, and pubertal timing has been reported and prompts further investigations to validate a true association. The systemic absorption of OMC has no reported effect on thyroid and reproductive hormone levels. In conclusion, current evidence is not sufficient to support the causal relationship between the elevated systemic level of BP‐3 or OMC and adverse health outcomes. There are either contradictory findings among different studies or an insufficient number of studies to corroborate the observed association. To accurately evaluate the long‐term risk of exposure to BP‐3 and OMC from sunscreen, a well‐designed longitudinal randomized controlled trial needs to be conducted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijd.14824

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review of 29 studies demonstrated that oxybenzone had no adverse effects on male and female fertility, female reproductive hormone levels, adiposity, fetal growth, childhood neurodevelopment, or sexual maturation, and octinoxate had no effect on thyroid and reproductive hormone levels.

    “However, a systematic review of 29 studies looking at the effects of two of the most commonly studied sunscreen ingredients-oxybenzone and octinoxate-demonstrated that oxybenzone had no adverse effects on male and female fertility, female reproductive hormone levels, adiposity, fetal growth, childhood neurodevelopment, or sexual maturation, and octinoxate had no effect on thyroid and reproductive”

    From Sunscreens and Photoaging: A Review of Current Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [53]

  • The evidence is not yet sufficient to support a causal relationship between elevated systemic levels of oxybenzone or octinoxate and adverse health outcomes.

    “Although the review recommended further research into the effects of oxybenzone levels on thyroid hormone, testosterone level, kidney function, and pubertal timing, the evidence is not yet sufficient to support a causal relationship between the elevated systemic levels of oxybenzone or octinoxate and adverse health outcomes.”

    From Sunscreens and Photoaging: A Review of Current Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [53]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [50]Tang R, Chen M-j, Ding G-d, Associations of prenatal exposure to phenols with birth outcomes. Environmental Pollution. 2013; 178: 115– 120. 23562958

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suh, S., Pham, C., Smith, J., & Mesinkovska, N. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Mesinkovska, Natasha A.
Venue
International Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-28
Volume
59
Issue
9
Pages
1033-1042
ISSN
  • 0011-9059 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-4632
OpenAlex
W3007571091
Cited by
118
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Center for Scientific Review (F30EY029136, T32EY024236, T32GM007250)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
sunscreen ingredients, benzophenone-3, octinoxate, systemic absorption, human health effects, endocrine disruption, thyroid hormones, testosterone, reproductive hormones, fertility, pubertal timing, brain development, adiposity, renal function
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Humans, Male, Sunscreening Agents, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review