Cited by 91Food composition and propertiesFood and Agricultural SciencesAdvanced Scientific Research Methods

Influence of pineapple, apple and melon by-products on cookies: physicochemical and sensory aspects

de Toledo, Nataly Maria Viva, Nunes, Larissa Peixoto, da Silva, Paula Porrelli Moreira, Spoto, Marta Helena Fillet, Canniatti-Brazaca, Solange Guidolin·2017·International Journal of Food Science and Technology

Abstract

Physicochemical and sensory effects were investigated regarding the partial substitution of wheat flour in cookies with flours made of pineapple, apple and melon by-products, in the concentrations 5%, 10% and 15%. Cookies with 15% of melon flour were prominent in relation to the nutritional aspects, especially about the contents of fibres (4.67–6.46%) and ash (1.74–2.25%). The use of these by-products resulted in slightly darker cookies, with variations in diameter and in the expansion factor. There was a positive influence of the use of the pineapple by-product concerning consumers' preference. Additionally, the cookies with 15% of pineapple by-product presented the highest acceptance rate (97%) and buying intention (53%). Therefore, the use of fruit by-products in the development of cookies is a viable alternative which can be explored for nutritional, technological and sensory purposes by the food industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijfs.13383

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Toledo, N. M. V., Nunes, L. P., da Silva, P. P. M., Spoto, M. H. F., & Canniatti-Brazaca, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Department of Agri-Food Industry, Food and Nutrition, “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo , Av. Pádua Dias 11, Piracicaba, CEP 13418-900, SP ,
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
International Journal of Food Science and Technology
Published
2017-03-29
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
1185-1192
ISSN
  • 0950-5423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2621
OpenAlex
W2598017688
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • FAPESP (n. 2014/14049-4)
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (n. 2014/14049-4)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Advanced Scientific Research Methods
Keywords
pineapple by-products, apple by-products, cookies, wheat flour substitution, physicochemical properties, sensory acceptability, consumer preferences, dietary fiber, ash content, expansion factor, food by-product valorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review