Cited by 15Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Lupus Anticoagulant Diagnosis in Patients Receiving Direct Oral FXa Inhibitors at Trough Levels: A Real-life Study

Gay, Juliette, Duchemin, Jérôme, Imarazene, Meriem, Fontenay, Michaela, Jourdi, Georges·2019·International Journal of Laboratory Hematology

Abstract

Introduction Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (xabans) induce false positive results for lupus anticoagulant (LA) diagnosis. Consequently, it is suggested not to perform LA testing in xabans patients although it may be useful in selected patients. In this monocentric study, we evaluated xabans impact at trough levels (ie, just before the next intake) on LA diagnosis in treated patients using dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and two LA sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Methods Sixty patients receiving rivaroxaban (30) or apixaban (30) were included. Plasma concentrations were measured using specific anti-Xa assays. LA testing was performed using one dRVVT (LAC-Screening ® /Confirm ® ; Siemens) and two LA sensitive aPTT-based assays (Hemosil ® Silica Clotting Time (SCT) Screen/Confirm; Werfen and Dade ® Actin ® Factor Sensitivity FSL/FS (Actin F); Siemens). Results Median [min-max] concentrations were 23 [ Conclusion lupus anticoagulant diagnosis in rivaroxaban and apixaban samples drawn at trough levels remains questionable whenever positive results are obtained. If LA testing in apixaban samples might be useful to rule-out LA using dRVVT and/or aPTT-based assays, the wide majority of rivaroxaban samples would give false positive results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijlh.13101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All DOACs prolong dRVVT in screening and confirmatory procedures, with rivaroxaban affecting screening more than confirmatory (increasing potential false positives) and opposite apixaban action (increasing potential false negatives).

    “all DOACs prolong dRVVT in screening and confirmatory procedures, with rivaroxaban affecting screening more than confirmatory (increasing potential false positives) and opposite apixaban action (increasing potential false negatives) [73,74,75,76,77,78].”

    From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [77]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gay, J., Duchemin, J., Imarazene, M., Fontenay, M., & Jourdi, G.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • Service d’Hématologie Biologique AP‐HP Cochin Hospital Paris France
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Jourdi, Georges
Venue
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-05
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
738-744
ISSN
  • 1751-5521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-553X
OpenAlex
W2972270133
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Laboratory Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban, apixaban, false positives, dilute Russell viper venom time, activated partial thromboplastin time, trough concentration, anti-Xa assay, anticoagulation monitoring
MeSH terms
Rivaroxaban, Administration, Oral, Blood Coagulation Tests, False Positive Reactions, Humans, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Pyrazoles, Pyridones, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Factor Xa Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review