Cited by 1,197Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsHeparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis

Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection

Open access
PENGO, V., TRIPODI, A., REBER, G., RAND, J.H., ORTEL, T.L., GALLI, M., DE GROOT, P.G.·2009·Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

One of the conclusions of the subcommittee meeting on Lupus Anticoagulant/Phospholipid dependent antibodies, held in Geneva on 2007, was the need to update the guidelines on Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) detection. Particular emphasis was given to several aspects discussed in this official communication. A new paragraph is dedicated to the patient selection, and aims to minimize inappropriate requests for LA testing. Modalities for blood collection and processing are fully delineated and the choice of tests is limited to dRVVT and a sensitive aPTT. Calculation of cut-off values for each diagnostic step are clearly stated. A final paragraph reports the interpretation of the results in general and in particular situations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03555.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hydroxychloroquine use was associated with lower odds of persistently positive lupus anticoagulant and/or moderate-to-high Sapporo criteria antiphospholipid antibodies, with an odds ratio of 0.24 (95% CI 0.06-0.94), p=0.04.

    “Similarly, persistently positive LAC and/or moderate/high Sapporo criteria aPL Abs (aCL IgG or IGM, or anti-b2GPI IgG or IgM) (10) were associated with HCQ use, OR 0.24 (0.06, 0.94), p=0.04”

    From Hydroxychloroquine Use Is Associated with Lower Odds of Persistently Positive Antiphospholipid Antibodies and/or Lupus Anticoagulant in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (2013) · cites this paper as [10]

    The citation follows the description of persistently positive LAC and Sapporo-criteria antibodies. In Patient selection (page unavailable), the guideline says a positive lupus anticoagulant result must be repeated more than 12 weeks later, supporting the persistence requirement. Our copy does not establish the stated moderate-to-high antibody criteria or report an association with hydroxychloroquine, the odds ratio, or its p-value. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 2009 ISTH-SSC guidelines for LA detection have been useful in increasing uniformity in how LA testing is performed and interpreted.

    “The last update of the guidelines for LA detection by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Subcommittee (ISTH-SSC) in 2009 12 has proven useful in achieving greater uniformity in performance and interpretation of LA testing.”

    From Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee for lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2020) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Abstract identifies this as the 2009 update and specifies procedures for LA testing and interpretation. Its statement that guidelines had been useful over the preceding 13 years refers to the earlier criteria, not demonstrated effects of the 2009 update. The paper does not establish that the update had already increased uniformity. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Survey responses showed uncertainty or lack of agreement on testing in anticoagulated patients, cutoff values, and calculation and interpretation of results.

    “However, on other points, including testing in patients on anticoagulation, cutoff values, and calculation and interpretation of results, there was uncertainty or lack of agreement.12,15”

    From Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee for lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2020) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Patient selection section (page unavailable) reports variability in laboratory performance and says cut-off values and expression of results affect LA testing. The Integrated tests section (page unavailable) says interpreting results in patients taking vitamin K antagonists is difficult. These passages support difficulties with the named testing issues, but the paper does not report survey responses showing uncertainty or lack of agreement on them. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Integrated testing is sufficient to detect LA without performing the mixing test in samples with no other causes of clotting time prolongation and LA confirmatory test results within reference intervals.

    “For samples from patients with no other causes of clotting time prolongation and LA assay confirmatory test results within reference intervals, the increasingly popular paradigm of integrated testing is sufficient to detect the presence of LA without performing the mixing test at all.6, 7, 8, 9, 26, 27, 28, 31, 33, 34”

    From Lupus anticoagulant mixing tests for multiple reagents are more sensitive if interpreted with a mixing test‐specific cut‐off than index of circulating anticoagulant (2018) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Integrated tests section says these tests combine screening and confirmation and, in principle, do not require a mixing test. It does not establish that they are sufficient specifically when other causes of prolonged clotting time are absent and confirmatory results fall within reference intervals. Its statement is also more qualified than the citing sentence’s assertion of sufficiency. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The mixing test is mainly to discriminate between the presence of an inhibitor and coagulation factor deficiencies such as those occurring in patients on VKA.

    “The mixing test is mainly to discriminate between the presence of an inhibitor and coagulation factor deficiencies such as those occurring in patients on conventional oral anticoagulants/vitamin K antagonists (VKA).”

    From Mixing studies in lupus anticoagulant testing are required at least in some type of samples (2015) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Mixing test section (page unavailable) specifies normal plasma with approximately 100% activity of all clotting factors and notes that inhibitors can prolong a mixing test. The section on LA detection in patients taking VKA (page unavailable) discusses prolonged clotting times and possible mixing with normal plasma. Our copy does not explicitly say that the mixing test is mainly used to distinguish inhibitors from factor deficiencies, or identify VKA-related factor deficiencies as that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Collection, Transport, and Processing of Blood Specimens for Testing Plasma- Based Coagulation Assays and Molecular Hemostasis Assays; Approved Guideline -Fifth Edition. CLSI document H21-A5 (ISBN 1-56238-657- 3). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898 USA, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PENGO, V., TRIPODI, A., REBER, G., RAND, J. H., ORTEL, T. L., GALLI, M., & DE GROOT, P. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • Montefiore Medical Center (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
PENGO, V.
Venue
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
1737-1740
ISSN
1538-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069797332
Cited by
1,197
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 82
FWCI
48.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, patient selection, activated partial thromboplastin time, cut-off values, interpretation of results, diagnostic guidelines
MeSH terms
Anticoagulants, Blood Coagulation, Blood Specimen Collection, Female, Humans, Indicators and Reagents, Male, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Phospholipids, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic, Prothrombin Time, Specimen Handling, Vitamin K, Artifacts, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review