Evaluation of DOAC Filter, a New Device to Remove Direct Oral Anticoagulants from Plasma Samples
Abstract
Introduction Directs oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can interfere with coagulation assays, especially in thrombophilia workup. To avoid these interferences, a new device, DOAC Filter, allows the removal of DOACs from citrated plasma. This study aims to confirm that DOAC Filter efficiently removes DOACs and to ascertain that coagulation assays are not impacted by filtration. Methods Directs oral anticoagulants Filter (Diagnostica Stago, France) is a filtration cartridge in which DOAC molecules are trapped by noncovalent binding, while plasma is filtered through a solid phase. Normal pool plasma (NPP) spiked with DOACs up to 300 ng/mL, with dabigatran etexilate (n = 27), rivaroxaban (n = 35), apixaban (n = 33), and edoxaban (n = 27) or 120 ng/mL for betrixaban (n = 4), and 18 plasma's samples from DOAC-treated patients were used to assess efficacy. The potential impact of DOAC Filter on coagulation assays was evaluated with NPP and plasma's samples from positive and negative lupus anticoagulant (LA) patients. Results Directs oral anticoagulants concentrations measured after filtration were below the limit of detection (LoD) of DOAC-specific assays for all plasmas tested, except for one apixaban plasma sample, with postfiltration concentration slightly higher than anti-Xa assay LoD (25.1 ng/mL). Coagulation assays results varied between -4 and +8% after filtration and between -6 and +8% for LA plasmas. Such limited variations are not expected to have any clinical impact. Conclusion…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both DOAC removal strategies (absorbents and filtration) can provide incomplete drug removal or influence the clotting times, resulting in possible false positives and false negatives in LA testing.
“Both removal strategies can provide an incomplete drug removal or influence the clotting times, resulting in possible false positives and false negatives in LA testing [81,82,85,86].”
From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
Cites
Tripodi, A., Cohen, H., & Devreese, K. M. J. (2020) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.14846 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Direct oral anticoagulants: analysis of worldwide use and popularity using Google trends
Lippi, G., Mattiuzzi, C., Cervellin, G., & Favaloro, E. J. (2017) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm.2017.06.65 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass
Molinari, A. C., Martini, T., Banov, L., Ierardi, A., Leotta, M., Strangio, A., & Santoro, R. C. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12206654 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Both removal strategies can provide an incomplete drug removal or in-fluence the clotting times, resulting in possible false positives and false negatives in LA testing [81,82,85,86].”
BackgroundViewpoint: Lupus anticoagulant detection and interpretation in antiphospholipid syndrome
Efthymiou, M., Bertolaccini, M. L., & Cohen, H. (2024) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kead623 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sevenet, P., Cucini, V., Hervé, T., Depasse, F., Carlo, A., Contant, G., & Mathieu, O.
- Affiliations
- Stago (France) (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Depasse, François
- Venue
- International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-06-22
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 636-642
- ISSN
- 1751-5521 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-553X
- OpenAlex
- W3036636281
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Laboratory Hematology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Diagnostica Stago
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Keywords
- direct oral anticoagulants, plasma filtration, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, betrixaban, lupus anticoagulant, anti-Xa assay, non-covalent binding
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Anticoagulants, Blood Coagulation, Blood Coagulation Tests, Humans, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review