Cited by 21Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Evaluation of DOAC Filter, a New Device to Remove Direct Oral Anticoagulants from Plasma Samples

Sevenet, Pierre‐Olivier, Cucini, Virginie, Hervé, Tristan, Depasse, François, Carlo, Audrey, Contant, Geneviève, Mathieu, Olivier·2020·International Journal of Laboratory Hematology

Abstract

Introduction Directs oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can interfere with coagulation assays, especially in thrombophilia workup. To avoid these interferences, a new device, DOAC Filter, allows the removal of DOACs from citrated plasma. This study aims to confirm that DOAC Filter efficiently removes DOACs and to ascertain that coagulation assays are not impacted by filtration. Methods Directs oral anticoagulants Filter (Diagnostica Stago, France) is a filtration cartridge in which DOAC molecules are trapped by noncovalent binding, while plasma is filtered through a solid phase. Normal pool plasma (NPP) spiked with DOACs up to 300 ng/mL, with dabigatran etexilate (n = 27), rivaroxaban (n = 35), apixaban (n = 33), and edoxaban (n = 27) or 120 ng/mL for betrixaban (n = 4), and 18 plasma's samples from DOAC-treated patients were used to assess efficacy. The potential impact of DOAC Filter on coagulation assays was evaluated with NPP and plasma's samples from positive and negative lupus anticoagulant (LA) patients. Results Directs oral anticoagulants concentrations measured after filtration were below the limit of detection (LoD) of DOAC-specific assays for all plasmas tested, except for one apixaban plasma sample, with postfiltration concentration slightly higher than anti-Xa assay LoD (25.1 ng/mL). Coagulation assays results varied between -4 and +8% after filtration and between -6 and +8% for LA plasmas. Such limited variations are not expected to have any clinical impact. Conclusion…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijlh.13267

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both DOAC removal strategies (absorbents and filtration) can provide incomplete drug removal or influence the clotting times, resulting in possible false positives and false negatives in LA testing.

    “Both removal strategies can provide an incomplete drug removal or influence the clotting times, resulting in possible false positives and false negatives in LA testing [81,82,85,86].”

    From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [85]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sevenet, P., Cucini, V., Hervé, T., Depasse, F., Carlo, A., Contant, G., & Mathieu, O.
Affiliations
Stago (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
Depasse, François
Venue
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-22
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
636-642
ISSN
  • 1751-5521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-553X
OpenAlex
W3036636281
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Laboratory Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Diagnostica Stago
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
direct oral anticoagulants, plasma filtration, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, betrixaban, lupus anticoagulant, anti-Xa assay, non-covalent binding
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Anticoagulants, Blood Coagulation, Blood Coagulation Tests, Humans, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review