The DOI matches its Crossref record; 175 of the 175 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability‐oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
This paper is intended as a contribution to the ongoing conceptual development of sustainability‐oriented innovation (SOI) and provides initial guidance on becoming and being sustainable. The authors organize and integrate the diverse body of empirical literature relating to SOI and, in doing so, develop a synthesized conceptual framework onto which SOI practices and processes can be mapped. Sustainability‐oriented innovation involves making intentional changes to an organization's philosophy and values, as well as to its products, processes or practices to serve the specific purpose of creating and realizing social and environmental value in addition to economic returns. A critical reading of previous literature relating to environmental management and sustainability reveals how little attention has been paid to SOI, and what exists is only partial. In a review of 100 scholarly articles and 27 grey sources drawn from the period of the three Earth Summits (1992, 2002 and 2012), the authors address four specific deficiencies that have given rise to these limitations: the meaning of SOI; how it has been conceptualized; its treatment as a dichotomous phenomenon; and a general failure to reflect more contemporary practices. The authors adopt a framework synthesis approach involving first constructing an initial architecture of the landscape grounded in previous studies, which is subsequently iteratively tested, shaped, refined and reinforced into a model of SOI with data drawn from included studies: so advancing theoretical development in the field of SOI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,535
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Self-citationThe theory of the growth of the firm
Penrose, E. (1996) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(96)90295-2 · Cited by 13,770
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333
Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259855 · Cited by 12,527
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425 · cited 1×
“Amit and Schoemaker (1993) defined capabilities as the ‘capacity to deploy resources, usually in combination, using organizational processes, to affect a desired end’.”
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.1016/S1066-7938(00)80022-6 · doi:10.1016/s1066-7938(00)80022-6
- Anderson R., 2009, Confessions of a Radical Industrialist. How Interface Proved that You Can Build a Successful Business without Destroying the Planet
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.031 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.031
- Baya V., 2011, Sustainability: moving from compliance to leadership, Technology Forecast: A Quarterly Journal, 4, 6
- Bent D., 2012, Breakthrough Innovation. Your Guide to Innovating for a Brighter Future
- 10.1002/joe.20117 · doi:10.1002/joe.20117
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(199808)6:2<49::AID-SD84>3.0.CO;2-I · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1719(199808)6:2<49::aid-sd84>3.0.co;2-i
- 10.1080/01446190210163534 · doi:10.1080/01446190210163534
- 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.020 · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.020
- Carson R., 1962, Silent Spring
- Chang Z.K., 2010, Biomimicry: Tool for Innovation at All Levels of Organization
- Cole H., 1973, Thinking about the Future: A Critique of the Limits to Growth
- Desrochers P., 2009, The post war intellectual roots of the population bomb. Fairfield Osborn's ‘Our Plundered Planet’ and William Vogt's ‘Road to Survival’ in retrospect, Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development, 1, 37
- Draper S., 2013, Creating the Big Shift: System Innovation for Sustainability
- 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.004 · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.004
- 10.2307/258959 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1504/IJTM.2013.052671 · doi:10.1504/ijtm.2013.052671
- Govindarajan V., 2012, A reverse‐innovation playbook, Harvard Business Review, 90, 120
- 10.3200/ENVT.47.5.8-23 · doi:10.3200/envt.47.5.8-23
- Haanes K., 2011, Sustainability: the ‘embracers’ seize the advantage, MIT Sloan Management Review, 1
- Hollander E.E.(2003).The noble art of demand shaping – how the tenacity of sustainable innovation can be explained by it being radical in a new sense.Paper presented at GIN2003 Innovating for Sustainability 11th International Network Conference 12–15 October San Francisco State University.
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.01.014 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.01.014
- Joshi S., 2010, Sustainable and Inclusive Innovation: Strategies for Tomorrow's World
- Kaval P., 2011, Measuring and Valuing Environmental Impacts. A Systematic Review of Existing Methodologies
- 10.1007/s10551-011-0936-4 · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0936-4
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199905/06)8:3<177::AID-BSE196>3.0.CO;2-1 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0836(199905/06)8:3<177::aid-bse196>3.0.co;2-1
- 10.1002/tqem.3310010409 · doi:10.1002/tqem.3310010409
- 10.1002/tqem.20324 · doi:10.1002/tqem.20324
- Mittelstaedt J.D., 2008, Sustainable Consumption and Production: Framework for Action. 2nd Conference of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange (SCORE!) Network
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.12.010 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.12.010
- Mulgan G., 2013, Systems Innovation Discussion Paper
- OECD, 2009, Sustainable Manufacturing and Eco‐Innovation: Framework, Practices and Measurement Synthesis Report
- 10.1787/9789264080355-50-en · doi:10.1787/9789264080355-50-en
- 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2010.06.004 · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2010.06.004
- Porter M.E., 2011, Creating shared value, Harvard Business Review, 89, 62
- Porter M.E., 1995, Green and competitive, Harvard Business Review, 120
- 10.1108/00251740710753675 · doi:10.1108/00251740710753675
- UN, 1999, Business and the United Nations: Partners in Sustainable Development
- UN Global Compact and Accenture, 2013, CEO study on Sustainability 2013. Architects for a Better World
- 10.1108/09566160110389942 · doi:10.1108/09566160110389942
Cited by
The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models
Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067 · Cited by 1,202
Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12102 · Cited by 995
Self-citationInnovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future
Silvestre, B. S., & Ţîrcă, D. M. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.244 · Cited by 684
Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles
Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942 · Cited by 528
Innovation in family firms: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research
Calabrò, A., Vecchiarini, M., Gast, J., Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S. (2019) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12192 · Cited by 495
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-17
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 180-205
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2370
- OpenAlex
- W1557570256
- Cited by
- 1,584
- References
- 175
- FWCI
- 15.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Funders
- Network for Business Sustainability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainability‐oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ijmr.12068
- The paper
- Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability‐oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.