The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SMEs and Marketing: A Systematic Literature Review
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a systematic review of recent academic literature analysing the role, organization and management of marketing activities in small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs). To this end, 310 articles published between 2006 and 2015 in 69 main journals devoted to small firms/entrepreneurship and management/marketing fields were analysed. This review shows that SMEs’ marketing has received great attention in both management and marketing literature in recent years. Findings reveal, on the one hand, the emerging role of networks and information and communication technologies in marketing behaviour by SMEs, and on the other hand a research gap in terms of specific marketing practices. Entrepreneurial marketing has been used as the main conceptual framework in reviewed studies, even if findings overall still point out a distance between the theoretical bases of reviewed contributions and the study of SMEs’ marketing behaviour and practices. Therefore, future research on the role of resources, relationships and networks could benefit from the combination of theories developed within the field of entrepreneurship with other approaches such as the resource‐based view, the dynamic capabilities theory and the Industrial Marketing and Purchasing (IMP) framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747
Lai, C.-S., Chiu, C.-J., Yang, C.-F., & Pai, D.-C. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0433-1 · Cited by 852
Organisational, Technical and Data Quality Factors in CRM Adoption—SMEs Perspective
Alshawi, S., Missi, F., & Irani, Z. (2011) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.08.006 · Cited by 204
Entrepreneurial orientation and the franchise system
Dada, O. (., & Watson, A. (2013) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090561311306877 · Cited by 91
Cited by
Kulkov, I., Kulkova, J., Rohrbeck, R., Menvielle, L., Kaartemo, V., & Makkonen, H. (2024) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2773 · Cited by 420
Stornelli, A., Ozcan, S., & Simms, C. (2021) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104229 · Cited by 268
Satalkina, L., & Steiner, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12072764 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Bocconcelli, R., Cioppi, M., Fortezza, F., Francioni, B., Pagano, A., Savelli, E., & Splendiani, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-11-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-254
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2370
- OpenAlex
- W2557540155
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SMEs and Marketing: A Systematic Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ijmr.12128
- The paper
- Bocconcelli, R., Cioppi, M., Fortezza, F., Francioni, B., Pagano, A., Savelli, E., & Splendiani, S. (2018). SMEs and Marketing: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.