Cited by 63Diabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and Research

Effect of hospital-based telephone coaching on glycaemic control and adherence to management guidelines in type 2 diabetes, a randomised controlled trial

Varney, J. E., Weiland, T. J., Inder, W. J., Jelinek, G. A.·2014·Internal Medicine Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failure to achieve treatment targets is common among people with type 2 diabetes. Cost-effective treatments are required to delay the onset and slow the progression of diabetes-related complications. AIMS: This study aimed to measure the effect of a 6-month telephone coaching intervention on glycaemic control, risk factor status and adherence to diabetes management practices at the intervention's conclusion (6 months) and at 12 months. METHOD: This randomised controlled trial recruited 94 adults with type 2 diabetes and an HbA1C > 7% from the Diabetes Clinic of St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne. People who were non-English speaking, cognitively impaired, severely hearing impaired or without telephone access were excluded. Participants were randomised to receive usual care plus 6 months of telephone coaching focusing on achieving treatment targets and complication screening, or usual care only. The primary outcome was HbA1C at 6 months; secondary outcomes included other physiological and monitoring measures. RESULTS: Significant interaction effects were observed between group and time at 6 months, demonstrating improvement in HbA1C, fasting glucose, diastolic blood pressure and physical activity. The intervention's effect on these parameters was not sustained at 12 months. Intervention group participants also improved compliance with foot examinations and pneumococcal vaccination by 6 months and retinal screening by 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone coaching improved glycaemic control and adherence to complication screening in people with type 2 diabetes, for the duration of its delivery, but these effects were not maintained on withdrawal of the intervention. Strategies that assist patients to sustain these benefits are required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/imj.12515

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varney, J. E., Weiland, T. J., Inder, W. J., & Jelinek, G. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Varney, J. E.
Venue
Internal Medicine Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09
Volume
44
Issue
9
Pages
890-897
ISSN
  • 1444-0903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-5994
OpenAlex
W2125676573
Cited by
63
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Internal Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
St Vincent's Hospital Research Endowment Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, telephone coaching, glycemic control, HbA1c, diabetes management guidelines, retinal screening, foot examination, pneumococcal vaccination, physical activity, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, intervention sustainability
MeSH terms
Aged, Australia, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Telephone, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review