Cited by 26Thermal Regulation in MedicineNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringInfrared Thermography in Medicine

Monitoring skin temperature at the wrist in hospitalised patients may assist in the detection of infection

Open access
Holt, Stephen G., Yo, Jennifer H., Karschimkus, Connie, Volpato, Frank, Christov, Steve, Smith, Edward R., Hewitson, Tim D., Worth, Leon J. +1 more·2020·Internal Medicine Journal

Abstract

Background: Measuring temperature has always been a key observation in the diagnosis of infection. No studies have examined the usefulness of measuring temperature at the wrist to detect infection. Aim: We sought to determine whether a watch measuring wrist temperature could accurately identify patients who are infected. Methods: Prospective cross‐sectional pilot study of temperature monitoring in an unselected patients in a tertiary referral adult nephrology unit. Results: One hundred and four data recording sessions revealed 88 useful data sets, with recording failures in the others. Patients were retrospectively classified as having no infection (Group A, n = 60), clinically diagnosed infection with less than 24 h of treatment with antibiotics (Group B, n = 5), and clinically diagnosed infection with greater than 24 h on antibiotics (Group C, n = 23). There was a significantly higher average maximum temperature in Group B (mean (SEM)) 38°C (0.6) compared with Groups A (36.1°C (0.1)) and C (36.3°C (0.3)). Based on receiver operating characteristics (ROC) a cut‐off temperature of ≥37.5°C gave sensitivity 80% and specificity 98%. Mean electrodermal activity was significantly higher in Groups B and C. Conclusions: ROC of peripheral skin temperature measurements suggest that such a device may identify many patients requiring treatment for infection. This proof of principle study showed value in using a wearable device in the detection of infection and its potential as an early warning or monitoring device.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/imj.14748

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Signal quality assessments have been done under more general circumstances, but wearable data quality in the context of epilepsy has not been a widely researched topic so far.

    “Signal quality assessments have been done under more general circumstances10,34–37, but wearable data quality in the context of epilepsy has not been a widely researched topic so far8,9,38.”

    From Data quality evaluation in wearable monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holt, S. G., Yo, J. H., Karschimkus, C., Volpato, F., Christov, S., Smith, E. R., Hewitson, T. D., Worth, L. J., & Champion De Crespigny, P.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Department of Nephrology The Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia
Corresponding author
Holt, Stephen G.
Venue
Internal Medicine Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-05
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
685-690
ISSN
  • 1444-0903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-5994
OpenAlex
W2999136835
Cited by
26
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internal Medicine Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Department of Health, State Government of Victoria
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Thermal Regulation in Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Infrared Thermography in Medicine
Keywords
infection detection, peripheral skin temperature, electrodermal activity, hospitalized patients, nephrology patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Skin Temperature, Wrist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review