Cited by 555Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyAbdominal Surgery and Complications

Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality*

Nguyen, H Bryant, Corbett, Stephen W., Steele, Robert, Banta, Jim, Clark, Robin T., Hayes, Sean R., Edwards, Jeremy, Cho, Thomas W. +1 more·2007·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome implications of implementing a severe sepsis bundle in an emergency department as a quality indicator set with feedback to modify physician behavior related to the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN: Two-year prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Academic tertiary care facility. PATIENTS: Patients were 330 patients presenting to the emergency department who met criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Five quality indicators comprised the bundle for severe sepsis management in the emergency department: a) initiate central venous pressure (CVP)/central venous oxygen saturation (Scvo2) monitoring within 2 hrs; b) give broad-spectrum antibiotics within 4 hrs; c) complete early goal-directed therapy at 6 hrs; d) give corticosteroid if the patient is on vasopressor or if adrenal insufficiency is suspected; and e) monitor for lactate clearance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 63.8 +/- 18.5 yrs, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 29.6 +/- 10.6, emergency department length of stay 8.5 +/- 4.4 hrs, hospital length of stay 11.3 +/- 12.9 days, and in-hospital mortality 35.2%. Bundle compliance increased from zero to 51.2% at the end of the study period. During the emergency department stay, patients with the bundle completed received more CVP/Scvo2 monitoring (100.0 vs. 64.8%, p < .01), more antibiotics (100.0 vs. 89.7%, p = .04),…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000259463.33848.3d

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, H. B., Corbett, S. W., Steele, R., Banta, J., Clark, R. T., Hayes, S. R., Edwards, J., Cho, T. W., & Wittlake, W. A.
Affiliations
Loma Linda University (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2007-04
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
1105-1112
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106534536
Cited by
555
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 47
FWCI
33.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Keywords
severe sepsis, septic shock, quality improvement bundle, quality indicators, early goal-directed therapy, central venous pressure monitoring, central venous oxygen saturation, broad-spectrum antibiotics, corticosteroids, vasopressors, adrenal insufficiency, lactate clearance, in-hospital mortality, emergency department, physician behavior, clinician feedback, bundle compliance
MeSH terms
Aged, Clinical Protocols, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitals, University, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Shock, Septic, Treatment Outcome, Hospital Mortality, Sepsis, APACHE, Guideline Adherence, Quality Indicators, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review