The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indoor CO 2 concentrations and cognitive function: A critical review
Open accessAbstract
Poor indoor air quality indicated by elevated indoor CO2 concentrations has been linked with impaired cognitive function, yet current findings of the cognitive impact of CO2 are inconsistent. This review summarizes the results from 37 experimental studies that conducted objective cognitive tests with manipulated CO2 concentrations, either through adding pure CO2 or adjusting ventilation rates (the latter also affects other indoor pollutants). Studies with varied designs suggested that both approaches can affect multiple cognitive functions. In a subset of studies that meet objective criteria for strength and consistency, pure CO2 at a concentration common in indoor environments was only found to affect high-level decision-making measured by the Strategic Management Simulation battery in non-specialized populations, while lower ventilation and accumulation of indoor pollutants, including CO2, could reduce the speed of various functions but leave accuracy unaffected. Major confounding factors include variations in cognitive assessment methods, study designs, individual and populational differences in subjects, and uncertainties in exposure doses. Accordingly, future research is suggested to adopt direct air delivery for precise control of CO2 inhalation, include brain imaging techniques to better understand the underlying mechanisms that link CO2 and cognitive function, and explore the potential interaction between CO2 and other environmental stimuli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Satish, U., Mendell, M. J., Shekhar, K., Hotchi, T., Sullivan, D., Streufert, S., & Fisk, W. J. (2012) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1104789 · Cited by 1,064
Allen, J. G., MacNaughton, P., Satish, U., Santanam, S., Vallarino, J., & Spengler, J. D. (2016) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1510037 · Cited by 977
Effects of heat stress on cognitive performance: the current state of knowledge
Hancock, P. A., & Vasmatzidis, I. (2003) · International Journal of Hyperthermia · doi:10.1080/0265673021000054630 · Cited by 512
Cedeño Laurent, J. G., Williams, A., Oulhote, Y., Zanobetti, A., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, J. D. (2018) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002605 · Cited by 205
Liu, W., Zhong, W., & Wargocki, P. (2017) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.020 · Cited by 169
Cited by
Porous organic polymers for CO2capture, separation and conversion
Song, K. S., Fritz, P. W., & Coskun, A. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00727d · Cited by 409
Development and application of an indoor carbon dioxide metric
Persily, A. (2022) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/ina.13059 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Du, B., Tandoc, M. C., Mack, M. L., & Siegel, J. A.
- Venue
- Indoor Air
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-07-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1067-1082
- ISSN
- 0905-6947 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0668
- OpenAlex
- W3036944027
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indoor CO 2 concentrations and cognitive function: A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ina.12706
- The paper
- Du, B., Tandoc, M. C., Mack, M. L., & Siegel, J. A. (2020). Indoor CO 2 concentrations and cognitive function: A critical review. Indoor Air. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12706
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.