Cited by 15Language Development and DisordersReading and Literacy DevelopmentPhonetics and Phonology Research

Infant‐directed speech to infants at risk for dyslexia: A novel cross‐dyad design

Open access
Kalashnikova, Marina, Goswami, Usha, Burnham, Denis·2020·Infancy

Abstract

When mothers speak to infants at risk for developmental dyslexia, they do not hyperarticulate vowels in their infant‐directed speech (IDS). Here, we used an innovative cross‐dyad design to investigate whether the absence of vowel hyperarticulation in IDS to at‐risk infants is a product of maternal infant‐directed behavior or of infants’ parent‐directed cues. Interactions between mothers and infants who were at risk or not at risk for dyslexia were recorded in three conditions: when mothers interacted with (a) their own infants, (b) infants who were not their own but of the same risk status, and (c) infants who were not their own and of the opposite risk status. This design revealed both infant and parent effects. Mothers of not‐at‐risk infants hyperarticulated vowels significantly more when speaking to not‐at‐risk than to at‐risk infants. In contrast, mothers of at‐risk infants hyperarticulated vowels significantly less than NAR mothers, and this was irrespective of infant status. Mothers of not‐at‐risk infants thus adjusted their IDS to the infant's risk status, while mothers of at‐risk infants did not. We suggest that IDS is determined reciprocally by characteristics of both partners in the dyad: Both infant and maternal factors are essential for the vowel hyperarticulation component of IDS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/infa.12329

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalashnikova, M., Goswami, U., & Burnham, D.
Affiliations
  • Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (ES)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Kalashnikova, Marina
Venue
Infancy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-22
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
286-303
ISSN
  • 1525-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7078
OpenAlex
W3007605605
Cited by
15
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infancy (publishedVersion)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (798908)
  • Australian Research Council (DP110105123)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
infant-directed speech, developmental dyslexia, high-risk infants, maternal speech, parent-infant interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review