Infant‐directed speech to infants at risk for dyslexia: A novel cross‐dyad design
Open accessAbstract
When mothers speak to infants at risk for developmental dyslexia, they do not hyperarticulate vowels in their infant‐directed speech (IDS). Here, we used an innovative cross‐dyad design to investigate whether the absence of vowel hyperarticulation in IDS to at‐risk infants is a product of maternal infant‐directed behavior or of infants’ parent‐directed cues. Interactions between mothers and infants who were at risk or not at risk for dyslexia were recorded in three conditions: when mothers interacted with (a) their own infants, (b) infants who were not their own but of the same risk status, and (c) infants who were not their own and of the opposite risk status. This design revealed both infant and parent effects. Mothers of not‐at‐risk infants hyperarticulated vowels significantly more when speaking to not‐at‐risk than to at‐risk infants. In contrast, mothers of at‐risk infants hyperarticulated vowels significantly less than NAR mothers, and this was irrespective of infant status. Mothers of not‐at‐risk infants thus adjusted their IDS to the infant's risk status, while mothers of at‐risk infants did not. We suggest that IDS is determined reciprocally by characteristics of both partners in the dyad: Both infant and maternal factors are essential for the vowel hyperarticulation component of IDS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mothers of infants at-risk for dyslexia hyperarticulate vowels in IDS significantly less than mothers of Low-Risk/typically developing infants.
“Mothers of infants at-risk for dyslexia have been found to hyperarticulate vowels in IDS significantly less than mothers of Low-Risk/typically developing infants [33].”
Cites
Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech
Fernald, A., & Kuhl, P. (1987) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/0163-6383(87)90017-8 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
A new view of language acquisition
Kuhl, P. K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.22.11850 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
An association between mothers' speech clarity and infants' speech discrimination skills
Liu, H., Kuhl, P. K., & Tsao, F. (2003) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00275 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Reindl, V., Gerloff, C., Scharke, W., & Konrad, K. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.060 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Investigating the role of infant-directed speech with a computer model
de Boer, B., & Kuhl, P. K. (2003) · Acoustics Research Letters Online · doi:10.1121/1.1613311 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Goble, G., Hennessy, V., Cheng, T.-H. Z., Rodda, A., Taulu, S., Gordon, R. L., & Zhao, T. C. (2026) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0335596
- Authors
- Kalashnikova, M., Goswami, U., & Burnham, D.
- Affiliations
- Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (ES)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Kalashnikova, Marina
- Venue
- Infancy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-02-22
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 286-303
- ISSN
- 1525-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7078
- OpenAlex
- W3007605605
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Infancy (publishedVersion)
- Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
- Hispana (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (798908)
- Australian Research Council (DP110105123)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- infant-directed speech, developmental dyslexia, high-risk infants, maternal speech, parent-infant interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review