Cited by 62Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Helpful and unhelpful responses after suicide: Experiences of bereaved family members

Peters, Kath, Cunningham, Colleen, Murphy, Gillian, Jackson, Debra·2016·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Individuals who are bereaved by suicide and other traumatic natured deaths are thought to be at greater risk of psychological complications, than people bereaved by other means. While it is recognized that interventions can influence the bereavement process, there remains limited communications about both helpful responses and those that may adversely influence the grieving process for the suicide bereaved. This paper presents findings from a narrative study, which sought the experiences of family members after the loss of a loved one as a result of suicide. The study findings demonstrated that responses by agencies are often insensitive and not aligned with the needs of those bereaved. We argue that training is paramount for all services to increase awareness of the needs of people bereaved by suicide and available support services. Changes to organizational policies in relation to finance support would greatly support the bereaved during their time of grief and heightened distress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/inm.12224

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, K., Cunningham, C., Murphy, G., & Jackson, D.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Thomas Embling Hospital (AU)
  • Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Corresponding author
Peters, Kath
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
418-425
ISSN
  • 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0349
OpenAlex
W2327239337
Cited by
62
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
  • Radar (Oxford Brookes University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Foundation of Hope for Research and Treatment of Mental Illness
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
suicide bereavement, bereaved families, grief, support services, organizational policy, employee training, financial support, traumatic death, bereavement interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Bereavement, Family, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Mental Health Services, Social Support, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review