Experience coercion, post‐traumatic stress, and satisfaction with treatment associated with different coercive measures during psychiatric hospitalization
Abstract
Coercive measures are frequently used in psychiatric hospitalization. However, there are few studies that analyse perceived coercion, post‐traumatic stress, and subjective satisfaction with the hospitalization treatment associated with different types of coercive measures. The sample consisted of 111 patients admitted to two psychiatric units and divided into three groups based on the measure applied: involuntary medication (N = 41), mechanical restraint (N = 32), and combined measures (mechanical restraint and involuntary medication; N = 38). The outcome variables were perceived coercion evaluated with the Coercion Experience Scale (CES), post‐traumatic stress evaluated with the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS), and satisfaction with the treatment evaluated with the Client's Assessment of Treatment (CAT). The results found higher levels of perceived coercion associated with the use of mechanical restraint (P = 0.002) and combined measures (P < 0.001) in comparison with involuntary medication. Additionally, in relation to post‐traumatic stress, mechanical restraint (P = 0.013) and combined measures (P = 0.004) were more stressful compared to involuntary medication. Finally, the use of combined measures was associated with lower satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric treatment compared to the use of involuntary medication (P = 0.006). The following recommendation would be consistent with the results found: if a patient does not specify a preference for some type of measure, involuntary medication could be used and mechanical restraint avoided, especially when used in combination with involuntary medication.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients who experienced coercive measures such as physical restraint, mechanical restraint, chemical restraint, and seclusion were more likely to perceive coercion.
“Patients who experienced coercive measures such as physical restraint [111,124,127], mechanical restraint [150], chemical restraint [124], and seclusion [58,124] were more likely to perceive coercion.”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [127]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review
Chieze, M., Hurst, S., Kaiser, S., & Sentissi, O. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00491 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review
Lessard-Deschênes, C., Pariseau-Legault, P., Billé, V., Sergerie-Richard, S., Hudson, E., Silva, B., Drouin, J.-S., Désilets, M., & Goulet, M.-H. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13151868 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Mandarelli, G., Parmigiani, G., Trobia, F., Tessari, G., Roma, P., Biondi, M., & Ferracuti, S. (2019) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.12.006 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Psychiatric admission as a risk factor for posttraumatic stress disorder
Martinaki, S., Kostaras, P., Mihajlovic, N., Papaioannou, A., Asimopoulos, C., Masdrakis, V., & Angelopoulos, E. (2021) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114176 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Fossum, S. Ø., Moen, Ø. L., Gonzalez, M. T., Schröder, A., & Skundberg-Kletthagen, H. (2024) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1080/01612840.2024.2361336 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Aragonés‐Calleja, M., & Sánchez‐Martínez, V. (2025) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/jpm.13128 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guzmán‐Parra, J., Aguilera‐Serrano, C., García‐Sanchez, J. A., García‐Spínola, E., Torres‐Campos, D., Villagrán, J. M., Moreno‐Küstner, B., & Mayoral‐Cleries, F.
- Affiliations
- Department of Mental Health Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA) University General Hospital of Málaga Málaga Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (ES)
- Department of Mental Health Hospital of Jerez de la Frontera Cádiz Spain
- Universidad de Málaga (ES)
- Venue
- International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-21
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 448-456
- ISSN
- 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
- 1447-0349
- OpenAlex
- W2893654381
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Andalusia Government
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- coercive measures, psychiatric hospitalization, perceived coercion, post-traumatic stress, treatment satisfaction, mechanical restraint, involuntary medication, Davidson Trauma Scale, patient preferences
- MeSH terms
- Involuntary Treatment, Adult, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Restraint, Physical, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review