Cited by 5Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Investigating the Associations between Patient-Reported Quality of Care and Perceived Coercion: A Norwegian Cross-Sectional Study

Open access
Fossum, Siri Ødegaard, Moen, Øyfrid Larsen, Gonzalez, Marianne Thorsen, Schröder, Agneta, Skundberg-Kletthagen, Hege·2024·Issues in Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Patient perspectives on the quality of care received are fundamental to mental health care. This study aimed to investigate the association between patient-reported mental health care quality, perceived coercion, and various demographic, clinical, and ward-related factors. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 169 patients in Norwegian mental health wards using the quality in psychiatric care-inpatient (QPC-IP) instrument and experienced coercion scale (ECS). The analysis revealed a consistent pattern in which patients with higher perceived coercion consistently rated lower quality on all QPC-IP dimensions. The significant findings of the multiple regression models further supported this association. Beyond coercion, the factors influencing quality ratings include self-reported treatment results, participation in treatment planning, and knowledge of complaint procedures. Emphasizing the pivotal role of coercion in enhancing mental health care quality, these findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of patient experiences and underscore the importance of patient participation in mental health care improvement efforts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01612840.2024.2361336

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fossum, S. Ø., Moen, Ø. L., Gonzalez, M. T., Schröder, A., & Skundberg-Kletthagen, H.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Faculty of Medicine and Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Gjøvik, Norway
Corresponding author
Fossum, Siri Ødegaard
Venue
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Published
2024-07-08
Volume
45
Issue
8
Pages
784-793
ISSN
  • 0161-2840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4673
OpenAlex
W4400413866
Cited by
5
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Issues in Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
perceived coercion, quality of care, mental health services, psychiatric inpatient care, patient perspectives, patient participation, treatment planning, grievance procedures
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Norway, Quality of Health Care, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review