Cited by 203Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutResilience and Mental Health

Workplace stressors, psychological well-being, resilience, and caring behaviours of mental health nurses: a descriptive correlational study

Foster, Kim, Roche, Michael, Giandinoto, Jo‐Ann, Furness, Trentham·2020·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

There is widespread recognition that workplace stress can have profound negative impacts on nurses' well-being and practice. Resilience is a process of positive adaptation to stress and adversity. This study aimed to describe mental health nurses' most challenging workplace stressors, and their psychological well-being, workplace resilience, and level of caring behaviours, explore the relationships between these factors, and describe differences in workplace resilience for sociodemographic characteristics. In a descriptive correlational study using convenience sampling, data were collected from N = 498 nurses working in mental health roles or settings in Victoria Australia via an online cross-sectional survey. Key findings included weak to strong (r = 0.301 to r = 0.750) positive relationships between workplace resilience with psychological well-being across all stressor categories (consumer/carer; colleague; organizational role; and organizational service). Psychological well-being was moderately high, but lower for nurses indicating consumer/carer-related stressors as their most stressful challenge. There were weak to moderate (r = 0.306 to r = 0.549) positive relationships between workplace resilience and psychological well-being, and no relationship between resilience and caring behaviours. Workplace resilience was lower (P < 0.05) for less experienced nurses compared with those with >5 years' experience, and lower for younger nurses compared with those aged ≥40 years. To improve their resilience and prevent psychological distress, there is prime opportunity to support nursing students with well-being and resilience-building strategies during their undergraduate education, and to support new graduates with similar programmes when they enter the workforce.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/inm.12610

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foster, K., Roche, M., Giandinoto, J., & Furness, T.
Affiliations
  • Melbourne Health (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Foster, Kim
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-25
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
56-68
ISSN
  • 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0349
OpenAlex
W2945591231
Cited by
203
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9
FWCI
21.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
occupational stressors, psychological well-being, workplace resilience, caring behavior, psychiatric nurses, nurse well-being, nurses' experiences, nurse age, resilience interventions, nursing education
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Workforce, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Burnout, Professional, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Nursing, Workplace, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review