Cited by 293Resilience and Mental HealthStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

Resilience and mental health nursing: An integrative review of international literature

Foster, Kim, Roche, Michael, Delgado, Cynthia, Cuzzillo, Celeste, Giandinoto, Jo‐Ann, Furness, Trentham·2019·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Mental health nurses work in challenging and potentially high stress settings. Stressors can occur in the context of consumer, family, and/or staff relationships, as well as the work environment and organization. The cumulative effects of stress and professional challenges can lead to harmful impacts for mental health nurses including burnout and poorer physical and mental health. Resilience involves a process of positive adaptation to stress and adversity. The aims of this integrative review were to examine understandings and perspectives on resilience, and explore and synthesize the state of knowledge on resilience in mental health nursing. Following systematic search processes, screening, and data extraction, 12 articles were included. Constant comparative analysis and synthesis of the data resulted in two key categories: Theoretical concepts of resilience and Knowledge on mental health nurses’ resilience. In mental health nursing, resilience has been variously constructed as an individual ability, collective capacity, or as an interactive person–environment process. Resilience was most often reported as low‐moderate, with positive correlations with hardiness, self‐esteem, life and job satisfaction, and negative correlations with depression and burnout. A resilience programme improved mental health nurses’ coping self‐efficacy and capacity to regulate thoughts and emotions and developed their resilient practice. Use of contemporary resilience definitions will inform more consistent investigation and progressively scaffold knowledge of this emergent construct in mental health nursing. Future research on the implementation of resilience programmes and resilience‐building strategies for mental health nurses at the individual, work unit, and organizational levels is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/inm.12548

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foster, K., Roche, M., Delgado, C., Cuzzillo, C., Giandinoto, J., & Furness, T.
Affiliations
  • Melbourne Health (AU)
  • Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Foster, Kim
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-07
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
71-85
ISSN
  • 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0349
OpenAlex
W2896087216
Cited by
293
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
resilience, psychiatric nurses, occupational stress, burnout, hardiness, self-esteem, job satisfaction, coping self-efficacy, person-environment interaction, nurse well-being
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Burnout, Professional, Humans, Psychiatric Nursing, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review