Cited by 26Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsClinical practice guidelines implementation

Guidelines for reporting randomized controlled trials in paediatric dentistry based on the CONSORT statement

Jayaraman, Jayakumar·2020·International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

Abstract

Background: The significance of randomized controlled trials (RCT) depends on how thoroughly the results were reported. Reporting of RCTs should be accurate and transparent and encompasses design, implementation, analysis, and results of the trial. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement and its extension were developed to guide the researchers to report clinical trials in a systematic manner. Despite this recommendation, the overall reporting quality of RCTs still remains suboptimal. Aim: To describe the relevance and importance of CONSORT reporting guidelines and explain the items using examples derived from randomized trials published in Paediatric Dentistry. Methods: This is a narrative review that illustrates the importance of reporting items in the CONSORT guidelines from relevant sources. RCTs published in the International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry between 2017 and 2020 were identified from PubMed and Scopus databases and through handsearching. An explanation has been provided for each of the 37 items in the 2010 CONSORT checklist and 17 items in the CONSORT extension for reporting abstracts. Conclusion: This explanation and elaboration document would enable investigators to report trials in Paediatric Dentistry with accuracy and transparency as well as for reviewers and editors in evaluating the suitability of RCTs for publication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ipd.12733

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jayaraman, J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Jayaraman, Jayakumar
Venue
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-10-22
Volume
31
Issue
S1
Pages
38-55
ISSN
  • 0960-7439 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-263X
OpenAlex
W3088583131
Cited by
26
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
CONSORT statement, reporting guidelines, randomized controlled trials, pediatric dentistry, trial reporting quality
MeSH terms
Child, Humans, Pediatric Dentistry, Reference Standards, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review