The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health economic burden that different wound types impose on the UK's National Health Service
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study was to estimate the patterns of care and annual levels of health care resource use attributable to the management of different wound types by the UK's National Health Service (NHS) in 2012/2013 and the annual costs incurred by the NHS in managing them. This was a retrospective cohort analysis of the records of 2000 patients in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database. Patients' characteristics, wound‐related health outcomes and all health care resource use were quantified, and the total NHS cost of patient management was estimated at 2013/2014 prices. The NHS managed an estimated 2·2 million patients with a wound during 2012/2013. Patients were predominantly managed in the community by general practitioners (GPs) and nurses. The annual NHS cost varied between £1·94 billion for managing 731 000 leg ulcers and £89·6 million for managing 87 000 burns, and associated comorbidities. Sixty‐one percent of all wounds were shown to heal in an average year. Resource use associated with managing the unhealed wounds was substantially greater than that of managing the healed wounds (e.g. 20% more practice nurse visits, 104% more community nurse visits). Consequently, the annual cost of managing wounds that healed in the study period was estimated to be £2·1 billion compared with £3·2 billion for the 39% of wounds that did not heal within the study year. Within the study period, the cost per healed wound ranged from £698 to £3998 per patient and that of an unhealed wound ranged from £1719 to £5976 per patient. Hence, the patient care cost of an unhealed wound was a mean 135% more than that of a healed wound. Real‐world evidence highlights the substantial burden that wounds impose on the NHS in an average year. Clinical and economic benefits to both patients and the NHS could accrue from strategies that focus on (a) wound prevention, (b) accurate diagnosis and (c) improving wound‐healing rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
Twaddle, S., & Qureshi, S. (2005) · Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.ehbc.2005.09.008 · Cited by 4,084
The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK
Bennett, G. (2004) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afh086 · Cited by 741
Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK
Guest, J. F., Ayoub, N., McIlwraith, T., Uchegbu, I., Gerrish, A., Weidlich, D., Vowden, K., & Vowden, P. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009283 · Cited by 610
Self-citationThe burden of chronic wounds in the UK.
Posnett, J. W., & Franks, P. J. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 315
Diabetic Foot Problems: Prevention and Management
Internal Clinical Guidelines Team (2015) · Cited by 218
Guest, J. F., Ayoub, N., & Greaves, T. (2015) · Journal of Wound Care · doi:10.12968/jowc.2015.24.12.572 · Cited by 22
Self-citation
Cited by
The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: A systematic review
Olsson, M., Järbrink, K., Divakar, U., Bajpai, R., Upton, Z., Schmidtchen, A., & Car, J. (2019) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12683 · Cited by 865
Martinengo, L., Olsson, M., Bajpai, R., Soljak, M., Upton, Z., Schmidtchen, A., Car, J., & Järbrink, K. (2019) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.10.005 · Cited by 686
Alginate hydrogel dressings for advanced wound management
Zhang, M., & Zhao, X. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.311 · Cited by 616
Formulation, stabilisation and encapsulation of bacteriophage for phage therapy
Malik, D. J., Sokolov, I. J., Vinner, G. K., Mancuso, F., Cinquerrui, S., Vladisavljevic, G. T., Clokie, M. R. J., Garton, N. J., Stapley, A. G. F., & Kirpichnikova, A. (2017) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2017.05.014 · Cited by 594
Implementing TIMERS: the race against hard-to-heal wounds
Atkin, L., Bućko, Z., Montero, E. C., Cutting, K., Moffatt, C., Probst, A., Romanelli, M., Schultz, G. S., & Tettelbach, W. (2019) · Journal of Wound Care · doi:10.12968/jowc.2019.28.sup3a.s1 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Guest, J. F., Ayoub, N., McIlwraith, T., Uchegbu, I., Gerrish, A., Weidlich, D., Vowden, K., & Vowden, P.
- Venue
- International Wound Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05-26
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 322-330
- ISSN
- 1742-4801 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-481X
- OpenAlex
- W2415836609
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 32.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health economic burden that different wound types impose on the UK's National Health Service. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/iwj.12603
- The paper
- Guest, J. F., Ayoub, N., McIlwraith, T., Uchegbu, I., Gerrish, A., Weidlich, D., Vowden, K., & Vowden, P. (2017). Health economic burden that different wound types impose on the UK's National Health Service. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.