Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An aseptically processed, acellular, reticular, allogenic human dermis improves healing in diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre follow‐up trial

Zelen, Charles M, Orgill, Dennis P, Serena, Thomas E, Galiano, Robert E, Carter, Marissa J, DiDomenico, Lawrence A, Keller, Jennifer, Kaufman, Jarrod P, Li, William W·2018·International Wound Journal

Abstract

Aseptically processed human reticular acellular dermal matrix (HR‐ADM) has been previously shown to improve wound closure in 40 diabetic patients with non‐healing foot ulcers. The study was extended to 40 additional patients (80 in total) to validate and extend the original findings. The entire cohort of 80 patients underwent appropriate offloading and standard of care (SOC) during a 2‐week screening period and, after meeting eligibility criteria, were randomised to receive weekly applications of HR‐ADM plus SOC or SOC alone for up to 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of wounds closed at 6 weeks. Sixty‐eight percent (27/40) in the HR‐ADM group were completely healed at 6 weeks compared with 15% (6/40) in the SOC group. The proportions of wounds healed at 12 weeks were 80% (34/40) and 30% (12/40), respectively. The mean time to heal within 12 weeks was 38 days for the HR‐ADM group and 72 days for the SOC group. There was no incidence of increased adverse or serious adverse events between groups or any graft‐related adverse events. The mean and median HR‐ADM product costs at 12 weeks were $1200 and $680, respectively. HR‐ADM is clinically superior to SOC, is cost effective relative to other comparable treatment modalities, and is an efficacious treatment for chronic non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/iwj.12920

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1080/07853890.2016.1231932 · DOI
  2. 10.1056/NEJMra1615439 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.2337/diacare.22.5.692 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0149124 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/iwj.12600 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001065 · DOI
  7. Harding K, 2010, An expert working group review. International consensus: acellular matrices for the treatment of wounds
  8. 10.1002/adfm.201501489 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1586/17434440.3.4.471 · DOI
  10. Irion G, 2010, Comprehensive wound management, 3
  11. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.519 · DOI
  12. Zelen CM, 2017, Human reticular acellular dermal matrix in the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcerations that failed standard conservative treatment: a retrospective crossover study, Wounds, 29, 39
  13. Woo KY, 2009, A cross‐sectional validation study of using NERDS and STONEES to assess bacterial burden, Ostomy Wound Manage, 55, 40
  14. Wendelken ME, 2011, Wounds measured from digital photographs using photodigital planimetry software: validation and rater reliability, Wounds, 23, 267
  15. 10.1186/1745-6215-15-19 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00790.x · DOI
  17. Varadhan R, 2013, Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research: A User's Guide
  18. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009590 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00585.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305486.06358.e0 · DOI
  21. 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1879 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.02.001 · DOI
  23. 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1696 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S1067-2516(07)60001-5 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/iwj.12566 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Zelen, C. M., Orgill, D. P., Serena, T. E., Galiano, R. E., Carter, M. J., DiDomenico, L. A., Keller, J., Kaufman, J. P., & Li, W. W.
Venue
International Wound Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-22
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
731-739
ISSN
  • 1742-4801
  • 1742-481X
Cited by
40
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation (DFU‐01)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An aseptically processed, acellular, reticular, allogenic human dermis improves healing in diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre follow‐up trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/iwj.12920
The paper
Zelen, C. M., Orgill, D. P., Serena, T. E., Galiano, R. E., Carter, M. J., DiDomenico, L. A., Keller, J., Kaufman, J. P., & Li, W. W. (2018). An aseptically processed, acellular, reticular, allogenic human dermis improves healing in diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre follow‐up trial. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12920

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.