The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An aseptically processed, acellular, reticular, allogenic human dermis improves healing in diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre follow‐up trial
Abstract
Aseptically processed human reticular acellular dermal matrix (HR‐ADM) has been previously shown to improve wound closure in 40 diabetic patients with non‐healing foot ulcers. The study was extended to 40 additional patients (80 in total) to validate and extend the original findings. The entire cohort of 80 patients underwent appropriate offloading and standard of care (SOC) during a 2‐week screening period and, after meeting eligibility criteria, were randomised to receive weekly applications of HR‐ADM plus SOC or SOC alone for up to 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of wounds closed at 6 weeks. Sixty‐eight percent (27/40) in the HR‐ADM group were completely healed at 6 weeks compared with 15% (6/40) in the SOC group. The proportions of wounds healed at 12 weeks were 80% (34/40) and 30% (12/40), respectively. The mean time to heal within 12 weeks was 38 days for the HR‐ADM group and 72 days for the SOC group. There was no incidence of increased adverse or serious adverse events between groups or any graft‐related adverse events. The mean and median HR‐ADM product costs at 12 weeks were $1200 and $680, respectively. HR‐ADM is clinically superior to SOC, is cost effective relative to other comparable treatment modalities, and is an efficacious treatment for chronic non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although the final follow-up wound area was similar between two treatment groups, the percentage area reduction (PAR) was demonstrated to be significantly increased in several studies [23, 26, 27, 31, 34].”
From Effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix used for diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions
Vogel, V., & Sheetz, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1890 · Cited by 2,328
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1080/07853890.2016.1231932 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMra1615439 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2337/diacare.22.5.692 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0149124 · DOI
- 10.1111/iwj.12600 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001065 · DOI
- Harding K, 2010, An expert working group review. International consensus: acellular matrices for the treatment of wounds
- 10.1002/adfm.201501489 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1586/17434440.3.4.471 · DOI
- Irion G, 2010, Comprehensive wound management, 3
- 10.1089/ten.2006.12.519 · DOI
- Zelen CM, 2017, Human reticular acellular dermal matrix in the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcerations that failed standard conservative treatment: a retrospective crossover study, Wounds, 29, 39
- Woo KY, 2009, A cross‐sectional validation study of using NERDS and STONEES to assess bacterial burden, Ostomy Wound Manage, 55, 40
- Wendelken ME, 2011, Wounds measured from digital photographs using photodigital planimetry software: validation and rater reliability, Wounds, 23, 267
- 10.1186/1745-6215-15-19 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00790.x · DOI
- Varadhan R, 2013, Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research: A User's Guide
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009590 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00585.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305486.06358.e0 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1879 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.02.001 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1696 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1067-2516(07)60001-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/iwj.12566 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Chen, P., Vilorio, N. C., Dhatariya, K., Jeffcoate, W., Lobmann, R., McIntosh, C., Piaggesi, A., Steinberg, J., Vas, P., Viswanathan, V., et al. (2024) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3644 · Cited by 246
Sui, L., Xie, Q., Jiang, H.-T., & Li, X.-D. (2024) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-024-01550-3 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Zelen, C. M., Orgill, D. P., Serena, T. E., Galiano, R. E., Carter, M. J., DiDomenico, L. A., Keller, J., Kaufman, J. P., & Li, W. W.
- Venue
- International Wound Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-04-22
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 731-739
- ISSN
- 1742-4801
- 1742-481X
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation (DFU‐01)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An aseptically processed, acellular, reticular, allogenic human dermis improves healing in diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre follow‐up trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/iwj.12920
- The paper
- Zelen, C. M., Orgill, D. P., Serena, T. E., Galiano, R. E., Carter, M. J., DiDomenico, L. A., Keller, J., Kaufman, J. P., & Li, W. W. (2018). An aseptically processed, acellular, reticular, allogenic human dermis improves healing in diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre follow‐up trial. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12920
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.