The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biofilm therapy for chronic wounds
Abstract
Chronic wounds have been a major factor of serious harm to global public health. At present, it is known that almost all chronic wounds contain biofilms, which seriously hinder the healing process. Removal of biofilms can effectively promote the healing of chronic wounds. As the study of wound biofilms deepens, many new treatment methods have emerged, thus bringing revolutionary means for the treatment of chronic wound biofilm. This review summarizes various methods for the treatment of chronic wound biofilm worldwide to provide a theoretical summary and practical basis for the selection of suitable wound biofilm treatment methods in clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures

Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Diagnosing BFI in chronic wounds remains challenging, with no standardized clinical protocol currently established for clinical research practice.8-11”
From SEMTWIST Quantification of Biofilm Infection in Human Chronic Wound Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Machine Learning (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 107
- 10.1684/ejd.2018.3486 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00321.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.20 · DOI
- 10.1111/iwj.12777 · DOI
- 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.3.137 · DOI
- 10.1111/wrr.12370 · DOI
- 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.2.64 · DOI
- 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.11.498 · DOI
- 10.3892/etm.2016.3008 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41579-018-0107-z · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00836.x · DOI
- 10.1111/wrr.12590 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.10.011 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00968.x · DOI
- 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup3b.S4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.burns.2009.02.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.10.024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/ijms13032535 · DOI
- 10.1038/jid.2009.221 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1211037 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.06.016 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-021-81977-z · DOI
- 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000060 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tim.2013.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/jcm8020197 · DOI
- 10.3390/antibiotics10121482 · DOI
- Harrison‐Balestra C, 2003, A wound‐isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa grows a biofilm in vitro within 10 hours and is visualized by light microscopy, Dermatol Surg, 29, 631
- 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00303.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2460/javma.230.11.1683 · DOI
- Jiang L, 2021, Advances in the mechanism of bacterial biofilm formation on chronic wounds and its diagnosis, Chin J Burns, 37, 5
- 10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.007 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms9101944 · DOI
- 10.1080/10934520600614546 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2123 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ac070800t · DOI
- 10.1177/2050312118812220 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.4577 · DOI
- 10.1149/1945-7111/ab732f · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2020.580779 · DOI
- 10.1089/wound.2015.0635 · DOI
- Lu Y, 2018, Research progress of chronic wound debridement, Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi, 32, 1096
- 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.Sup12.S10 · DOI
- Kadam S, 2019, Recent advances in non‐conventional antimicrobial approaches for chronic wound biofilms: have we found the ‘Chink in the Armor’?, Biomedicine, 7
- 10.1128/JVI.00385-15 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.00825-10 · DOI
- 10.2147/IJN.S35347 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.micres.2014.05.005 · DOI
- 10.1002/adhm.201701406 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.04.007 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.00756-16 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10103-019-02903-4 · DOI
- De Sousa DL, 2015, Effect of twice‐daily blue light treatment on matrix‐rich biofilm development, PLoS ONE, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0131941 · DOI
- 10.4137/PMC.S13209 · DOI
- 10.3389/fphar.2018.00203 · DOI
- 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00443 · DOI
- Zhang Y, 1952, Coumarin reduces virulence and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by affecting quorum sensing, type III secretion and C‐di‐GMP levels, Front Microbiol, 2018, 9
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01567 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12275-019-8635-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103907 · DOI
- 10.1093/jac/dkw384 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.5b09489 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110499 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.029 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.091 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmii.2016.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07357.x · DOI
- 10.2174/1568026618666181112143351 · DOI
- 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030642 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-981-13-3588-4_6 · DOI
- 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1137947 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.00318-08 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.077 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jss.2012.11.048 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrd3013 · DOI
- 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.475-490.2003 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.00035-08 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.00371-19 · DOI
- 10.15252/embj.201899363 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.00617-21 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00465 · DOI
- 10.3390/antibiotics11101426 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jiph.2013.05.005 · DOI
- 10.1111/iwj.12428 · DOI
- 10.4103/ijps.IJPS_245_16 · DOI
- 10.1111/wrr.12125 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsif.2015.0018 · DOI
- 10.1038/npjbiofilms.2016.6 · DOI
- 10.1111/iwj.12658 · DOI
- 10.1155/2016/7986234 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10482-018-1045-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10482-017-0938-z · DOI
- 10.1111/iwj.13093 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-19175-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/iwj.12619 · DOI
- 10.1002/term.3009 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12602-018-9486-8 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1716580115 · DOI
- 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020229 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00339 · DOI
- 10.1111/cmi.12522 · DOI
- 10.1002/sctm.19-0092 · DOI
- 10.1099/jmm.0.000861 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102388 · DOI
- 10.1099/mic.0.053959-0 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00144 · DOI
- 10.1093/jac/dku448 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Singh, S., Muniz De Oliveira, F., Wang, C., Kumar, M., Xuan, Y., DeMazumder, D., Sen, C. K., & Roy, S. (2025) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2024.0291 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Long, S., Wang, H., & Wang, Y.
- Venue
- International Wound Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1742-4801
- 1742-481X
- PMC
- PMC10858329
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilm therapy for chronic wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/iwj.14667
- The paper
- Liu, Y., Long, S., Wang, H., & Wang, Y. (2024). Biofilm therapy for chronic wounds. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14667