The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Akaike's Information Criterion in Generalized Estimating Equations
Abstract
Summary. Correlated response data are common in biomedical studies. Regression analysis based on the generalized estimating equations (GEE) is an increasingly important method for such data. However, there seem to be few model‐selection criteria available in GEE. The well‐known Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) cannot be directly applied since AIC is based on maximum likelihood estimation while GEE is nonlikelihood based. We propose a modification to AIC, where the likelihood is replaced by the quasi‐likelihood and a proper adjustment is made for the penalty term. Its performance is investigated through simulation studies. For illustration, the method is applied to a real data set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Generalized Estimating Equations
Hardin, J. W., & Hilbe, J. M. (2002) · doi:10.1201/9781420035285 · Cited by 1,766
Cited by
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., & Huyvaert, K. P. (2011) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6 · Cited by 4,104
Using Generalized Estimating Equations for Longitudinal Data Analysis
Ballinger, G. A. (2004) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428104263672 · Cited by 1,567
Serum neurofilament light: a biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis
Disanto, G., Barro, C., Benkert, P., Naegelin, Y., Schädelin, S., Giardiello, A., Zecca, C., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Leppert, D., et al. (2017) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24954 · Cited by 1,164
Walley, A. Y., Xuan, Z., Hackman, H. H., Quinn, E., Doe-Simkins, M., Sorensen-Alawad, A., Ruiz, S., & Ozonoff, A. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f174 · Cited by 999
Cavanaugh, J. E., & Neath, A. A. (2019) · WIREs Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.1460 · Cited by 910
Metadata
- Authors
- Pan, W.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-125
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0420
- OpenAlex
- W2110776215
- Cited by
- 2,493
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
