Cited by 1,567Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisAgriculture, Soil, Plant Science

Using Generalized Estimating Equations for Longitudinal Data Analysis

Open access
Ballinger, Gary A.·2004·Organizational Research Methods

Abstract

The generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach of Zeger and Liang facilitates analysis of data collected in longitudinal, nested, or repeated measures designs. GEEs use the generalized linear model to estimate more efficient and unbiased regression parameters relative to ordinary least squares regression in part because they permit specification of a working correlation matrix that accounts for the form of within-subject correlation of responses on dependent variables of many different distributions, including normal, binomial, and Poisson. The author briefly explains the theory behind GEEs and their beneficial statistical properties and limitations and compares GEEs to suboptimal approaches for analyzing longitudinal data through use of two examples. The first demonstration applies GEEs to the analysis of data from a longitudinal lab study with a counted response variable; the second demonstration applies GEEs to analysis of data with a normally distributed response variable from subjects nested within branch offices ofan organization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1094428104263672

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballinger, G. A.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Ballinger, Gary A.
Venue
Organizational Research Methods
Published
2004-04
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
127-150
ISSN
  • 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7425
OpenAlex
W2101831741
Cited by
1,567
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 61
FWCI
12.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Organizational Research Methods (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Keywords
generalized estimating equations, longitudinal analysis, repeated measures, working correlation matrix, within-subject correlation, generalized linear models, count data, nested data, Poisson regression, binomial regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review