The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Akaike information criterion: Background, derivation, properties, application, interpretation, and refinements
Abstract
The Akaike information criterion (AIC) is one of the most ubiquitous tools in statistical modeling. The first model selection criterion to gain widespread acceptance, AIC was introduced in 1973 by Hirotugu Akaike as an extension to the maximum likelihood principle. Maximum likelihood is conventionally applied to estimate the parameters of a model once the structure and dimension of the model have been formulated. Akaike's seminal idea was to combine into a single procedure the process of estimation with structural and dimensional determination. This article reviews the conceptual and theoretical foundations for AIC, discusses its properties and its predictive interpretation, and provides a synopsis of important practical issues pertinent to its application. Comparisons and delineations are drawn between AIC and its primary competitor, the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). In addition, the article covers refinements of AIC for settings where the asymptotic conditions and model specification assumptions that underlie the justification of AIC may be violated. This article is categorized under: Software for Computational Statistics > Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems Statistical Models > Model Selection Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Modeling Methods and Algorithms Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Information Theoretic Methods
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The linear mixed effects model including only diagnosis as a fixed effect and sample nested in case as a random effect was the best fit for the data as assessed with the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC).
“The linear mixed effects model including only diagnosis as a fixed effect and sample nested in case as a random effect was the best fit for the data as assessed with the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) [9].”
From Transmembrane protein 97 is a potential synaptic amyloid beta receptor in human Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Bozdogan, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294361 · Cited by 4,468
The Relationship Between Variable Selection and Data Agumentation and a Method for Prediction
Allen, D. M. (1974) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1974.10489157 · Cited by 1,469 · cited 5×
“Unlike AIC, BIC, and the variants of AIC mentioned in the previous section, Cp, PRESS, and MSE/R2adj are not developed in a likelihood-based paradigm.”
MethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1017/CBO9780511790485 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-0-387-71887-3 · DOI
- Lahiri P., 2001, Model selection. Institute of mathematical statistics lecture notes—Monograph series
- Akaike H., 1973, 2nd international symposium on information theory, 267
- 10.1016/j.csda.2005.05.009 · DOI
- 10.2307/2533213 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.csda.2005.05.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-7152(96)00128-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-0-8176-4619-6_33 · DOI
- Cavanaugh J. E., 1997, A bootstrap variant of AIC for state‐space model selection, Statistica Sinica, 7, 473
- 10.1016/j.stamet.2005.05.002 · DOI
- Hurvich C. M., 1990, Improved estimators of Kullback‐Leibler information for autoregressive model selection in small samples, Biometrika, 77, 709
- 10.1093/biomet/76.2.297 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9892.1993.tb00144.x · DOI
- 10.2307/2533006 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1003158526504 · DOI
- 10.2307/2289381 · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/83.4.875 · DOI
- Kullback S., 1968, Information theory and statistics
- 10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · DOI · Paper page
- Linhart H., 1986, Model selection
- 10.2307/1267380 · DOI
- Neath A. A., 2012, Mathematics in engineering, science and aerospace; special issue on “Theory and applications of divergence and information measures”, 381
- 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00120.x · DOI
- 10.1214/aos/1176344136 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/aos/1176344897 · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/68.1.45 · DOI
- Shibata R., 1997, Bootstrap estimate of Kullback‐Leibler information for model selection, Statistica Sinica, 7, 375
- Stone M., 1977, An asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by cross‐validation and Akaike's criterion, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 44, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01603.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/03610927808827599 · DOI
- Takeuchi K., 1976, Distribution of information statistics and criteria for adequacy of models, Mathematical Sciences, 153, 12
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transmembrane protein 97 is a potential synaptic amyloid beta receptor in human Alzheimer’s disease
Colom-Cadena, M., Toombs, J., Simzer, E., Holt, K., McGeachan, R., Tulloch, J., Jackson, R. J., Catterson, J. H., Spires-Jones, M. P., Rose, J., et al. (2024) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-023-02679-6 · Cited by 44
Kristensen, F. P. B., Sanchez-Lastra, M. A., Dalene, K. E., del Pozo Cruz, B., Ried-Larsen, M., Thomsen, R. W., Ding, D., Ekelund, U., & Tarp, J. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc23-0937 · Cited by 29
Drug supply measures and drug overdose mortality in the era of fentanyl and stimulants
Cano, M., Timmons, P., Hooten, M., & Sweeney, K. (2023) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports · doi:10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100197 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Cavanaugh, J. E., & Neath, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Biostatistics University of Iowa, Iowa City Iowa
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Illinois
- Venue
- WIREs Computational Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-14
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1939-5108
- 1939-0068
- Cited by
- 910
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review