Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonparametric Mixed Effects Models for Unequally Sampled Noisy Curves

Rice, John A., Wu, Colin O.·2001·Biometrics

Abstract

Summary.We propose a method of analyzing collections of related curves in which the individual curves are modeled as spline functions with random coefficients. The method is applicable when the individual curves are sampled at variable and irregularly spaced points. This produces a low‐rank, low‐frequency approximation to the covariance structure, which can be estimated naturally by the EM algorithm. Smooth curves for individual trajectories are constructed as best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) estimates, combining data from that individual and the entire collection. This framework leads naturally to methods for examining the effects of covariates on the shapes of the curves. We use model selection techniques—Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and cross‐validation—to select the number of breakpoints for the spline approximation. We believe that the methodology we propose provides a simple, flexible, and computationally efficient means of functional data analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00253.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rice, J. A., & Wu, C. O.
Venue
Biometrics
Published
2001-03
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
253-259
ISSN
  • 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0420
OpenAlex
W2099337407
Cited by
390
References
1
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.