The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Microfinance on Decision-Making Agency: Evidence from South India
Abstract
Evaluations of the effects of microfinance programmes on women's empowerment generate mixed results. While some are supportive of microfinance's ability to induce a process of economic, social and political empowerment, others are more sceptical and even point to a deterioration of women's overall well-being. Against this background, development scholars and practitioners have sought to distil some of the ingredients that might increase the likelihood of empowerment or at least reduce adverse effects. This article formally tests the impact of some of the suggested changes in programme features on one particular dimension of empowerment: decision-making agency. Using household survey data from South India, the author explores the importance of the borrower's gender and the lending technology for intra-household decision-making processes. It is shown that direct bank–borrower credit delivery does not challenge the existing decision-making patterns, regardless of whether men or women receive the credit. These findings change when credit is combined with financial and social group intermediation. Women's group membership seriously shifts overall decision-making patterns from norm-guided behaviour and male decision-making to more joint and female decision-making. Longer-term group membership and more intensive training and group meetings strengthen these patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.
Sufrin, S. C., & Olson, M. (1966) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521228 · Cited by 11,518
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings
Shrout, P. E. (1980) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(80)90063-4 · Cited by 6,010
Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment.
Kabeer, N. (1999) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00125 · Cited by 4,976
Evaluation: A Systematic Approach
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (1979) · Cited by 2,943
Pitt, M. M., & Khandker, S. R. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250037 · Cited by 1,705
''Bargaining'' and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household
Agarwal, B. (1997) · Feminist Economics · doi:10.1080/135457097338799 · Cited by 1,693
The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, by Mancur Olson
Latham, E. (1967) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2147334 · Cited by 1,551
Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought
Kabeer, N. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,362
Cited by
Does microfinance empower women? Evidence from self‐help groups in India
Swain, R. B., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2009) · International Review of Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/02692170903007540 · Cited by 435
What Constrains Financial Inclusion for Women? Evidence from Indian Micro data
Ghosh, S., & Vinod, D. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.011 · Cited by 373
(2011) · The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Holvoet, N.
- Venue
- Development and Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-102
- ISSN
- 0012-155X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7660
- OpenAlex
- W2005869244
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Microfinance on Decision-Making Agency: Evidence from South India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0012-155x.2005.00403.x
- The paper
- Holvoet, N. (2005). The Impact of Microfinance on Decision-Making Agency: Evidence from South India. Development and Change. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155x.2005.00403.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.