The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
STABILITY OF THE G-MATRIX IN A POPULATION EXPERIENCING PLEIOTROPIC MUTATION, STABILIZING SELECTION, AND GENETIC DRIFT
Abstract
Quantitative genetics theory provides a framework that predicts the effects of selection on a phenotype consisting of a suite of complex traits. However, the ability of existing theory to reconstruct the history of selection or to predict the future trajectory of evolution depends upon the evolutionary dynamics of the genetic variance-covariance matrix (G-matrix). Thus, the central focus of the emerging field of comparative quantitative genetics is the evolution of the G-matrix. Existing analytical theory reveals little about the dynamics of G, because the problem is too complex to be mathematically tractable. As a first step toward a predictive theory of G-matrix evolution, our goal was to use stochastic computer models to investigate factors that might contribute to the stability of G over evolutionary time. We were concerned with the relatively simple case of two quantitative traits in a population experiencing stabilizing selection, pleiotropic mutation, and random genetic drift. Our results show that G-matrix stability is enhanced by strong correlational selection and large effective population size. In addition, the nature of mutations at pleiotropic loci can dramatically influence stability of G. In particular, when a mutation at a single locus simultaneously changes the value of the two traits (due to pleiotropy) and these effects are correlated, mutation can generate extreme stability of G. Thus, the central message of our study is that the empirical question regarding G-matrix stability is not necessarily a general question of whether G is stable across various taxonomic levels. Rather, we should expect the G-matrix to be extremely stable for some suites of characters and unstable for others over similar spans of evolutionary time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Self-citationQUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY
Lande, R. (1979) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04694.x · Cited by 2,648
Effective deme sizes during long-term evolution estimated from rates of chromosomal rearrangement
Lande, R. (1979) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04678.x · Cited by 792
Cited by
Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate
Revell, L. J., Harmon, L. J., & Collar, D. C. (2008) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150802302427 · Cited by 879
Polygenic adaptation: a unifying framework to understand positive selection
Barghi, N., Hermisson, J., & Schlötterer, C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0250-z · Cited by 425
Bigger Brains Led to Bigger Bodies?: The Correlated Evolution of Human Brain and Body Size
Grabowski, M. (2016) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/685655 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, A. G., Arnold, S. J., & Bürger, R.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1747-1760
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W1987123121
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STABILITY OF THE G-MATRIX IN A POPULATION EXPERIENCING PLEIOTROPIC MUTATION, STABILIZING SELECTION, AND GENETIC DRIFT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00583.x
- The paper
- Jones, A. G., Arnold, S. J., & Bürger, R. (2003). STABILITY OF THE G-MATRIX IN A POPULATION EXPERIENCING PLEIOTROPIC MUTATION, STABILIZING SELECTION, AND GENETIC DRIFT. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00583.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.