The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fossils, feet and the evolution of human bipedal locomotion
Abstract
We review the evolution of human bipedal locomotion with a particular emphasis on the evolution of the foot. We begin in the early twentieth century and focus particularly on hypotheses of an ape‐like ancestor for humans and human bipedal locomotion put forward by a succession of Gregory, Keith, Morton and Schultz. We give consideration to Morton's (1935) synthesis of foot evolution, in which he argues that the foot of the common ancestor of modern humans and the African apes would be intermediate between the foot of Pan and Hylobates whereas the foot of a hypothetical early hominin would be intermediate between that of a gorilla and a modern human. From this base rooted in comparative anatomy of living primates we trace changing ideas about the evolution of human bipedalism as increasing amounts of postcranial fossil material were discovered. Attention is given to the work of John Napier and John Robinson who were pioneers in the interpretation of Plio‐Pleistocene hominin skeletons in the 1960s. This is the period when the wealth of evidence from the southern African australopithecine sites was beginning to be appreciated and Olduvai Gorge was revealing its first evidence for Homo habilis. In more recent years, the discovery of the Laetoli footprint trail, the AL 288‐1 (A. afarensis) skeleton, the wealth of postcranial material from Koobi Fora, the Nariokotome Homo ergaster skeleton, Little Foot (Stw 573) from Sterkfontein in South Africa, and more recently tantalizing material assigned to the new and very early taxa Orrorin tugenensis, Ardipithecus ramidus and Sahelanthropus tchadensis has fuelled debate and speculation. The varying interpretations based on this material, together with changing theoretical insights and analytical approaches, is discussed and assessed in the context of new three‐dimensional morphometric analyses of australopithecine and Homo foot bones, suggesting that there may have been greater diversity in human bipedalism in the earlier phases of our evolutionary history than previously suspected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lovejoy, C. O. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.211.4480.341 · Cited by 1,396
A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa
Brunet, M., Guy, F., Pilbeam, D., Mackaye, H. T., Likius, A., Ahounta, D., Beauvilain, A., Blondel, C., Bocherens, H., Boisserie, J.-R., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00879 · Cited by 1,075
Dennell, R. (1986) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/0305-4403(86)90058-0 · Cited by 1,050
Evolutionary History of the Robust Australopithecines
Grine, F. E. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203792667 · Cited by 983
The locomotor anatomy of Australopithecus afarensis
Stern Jr., J. T., & Susman, R. L. (1983) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330600302 · Cited by 860
An Introduction to Human Evolutionary Anatomy
(2002) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-02515-x · Cited by 733
A New Species of The Genus Homo From Olduvai Gorge
LEAKEY, L. S. B., TOBIAS, P. V., & NAPIER, J. R. (1964) · Nature · doi:10.1038/202007a0 · Cited by 726
Wood, B., & Collard, M. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.65 · Cited by 714
Australopithecus ramidus, a new species of early hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia
White, T. D., Suwa, G., & Asfaw, B. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/371306a0 · Cited by 690
Early Hominid Posture and Locomotion.
Rawling, C. P., & Robinson, J. T. (1974) · Man · doi:10.2307/2800701 · Cited by 636
Cited by
The foot core system: a new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function
McKeon, P. O., Hertel, J., Bramble, D., & Davis, I. (2015) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092690 · Cited by 572
Rethinking the evolution of the human foot: insights from experimental research
Holowka, N. B., & Lieberman, D. E. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.174425 · Cited by 135
Cerda-Molina, A. L., Hernández-López, L., de la O, C. E., Chavira-Ramírez, R., & Mondragón-Ceballos, R. (2013) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2013.00159 · Cited by 83
“Considering that full bipedalism appeared around two million years ago, with Homo ergaster (26), historically followed by clothing, and at sometime intimacy to copulate, a question of interest is why the human female genitals should retain semiochemical functions adequate to quadruped mammals.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Harcourt‐Smith, W. E. H., & Aiello, L. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Anatomy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 403-416
- ISSN
- 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7580
- OpenAlex
- W2131226790
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 32.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fossils, feet and the evolution of human bipedal locomotion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00296.x
- The paper
- Harcourt‐Smith, W. E. H., & Aiello, L. C. (2004). Fossils, feet and the evolution of human bipedal locomotion. Journal of Anatomy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00296.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.