The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking the evolution of the human foot: insights from experimental research
Abstract
Adaptive explanations for modern human foot anatomy have long fascinated evolutionary biologists because of the dramatic differences between our feet and those of our closest living relatives, the great apes. Morphological features, including hallucal opposability, toe length and the longitudinal arch, have traditionally been used to dichotomize human and great ape feet as being adapted for bipedal walking and arboreal locomotion, respectively. However, recent biomechanical models of human foot function and experimental investigations of great ape locomotion have undermined this simple dichotomy. Here, we review this research, focusing on the biomechanics of foot strike, push-off and elastic energy storage in the foot, and show that humans and great apes share some underappreciated, surprising similarities in foot function, such as use of plantigrady and ability to stiffen the midfoot. We also show that several unique features of the human foot, including a spring-like longitudinal arch and short toes, are likely adaptations to long distance running. We use this framework to interpret the fossil record and argue that the human foot passed through three evolutionary stages: first, a great ape-like foot adapted for arboreal locomotion but with some adaptations for bipedal walking; second, a foot adapted for effective bipedal walking but retaining some arboreal grasping adaptations; and third, a human-like foot adapted for enhanced economy during long-distance walking and running that had lost its prehensility. Based on this scenario, we suggest that selection for bipedal running played a major role in the loss of arboreal adaptations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of a flatter foot contact and absence of a clear heel strike may affect walking economy by reducing the total distance travelled by the body's centre of mass during a given step and/or increasing the amount of mechanical work needed to accelerate the body's centre of mass between steps.
“The use of a flatter foot contact and absence of a clear heel strike may affect walking economy, as it may reduce the total distance travelled by the body's centre of mass during a given step (Webber & Raichlen, 2016) and/or increase the amount of mechanical work needed to accelerate the body's centre of mass between steps (Adamczyk & Kuo, 2013; Holowka & Lieberman, 2018).”
From Forest terrains influence walking kinematics among indigenous Tsimane of the Bolivian Amazon (2022) · cites this paper as Holowka & Lieberman, 2018
Citations
Cites
A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia.
Brown, P., Sutikna, T., Morwood, M. J., Soejono, R. P., Jatmiko, Wayhu Saptomo, E., & Awe Due, R. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02999 · Cited by 1,075
Cartmill, M. (1985) · Functional Vertebrate Morphology · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674184404.c5 · Cited by 400 · cited 1×
“Additionally, we restrict our review to studies of terrestrial locomotion, but recommend Cartmill (1985), Richmond (2007), DeSilva (2009), Venkataraman et al. (2013), Holowka et al. (2017a) and Wunderlich and Ischinger (2017) for discussions of primate foot biomechanics and pedal grasping during…”
MethodRevised stratigraphy and chronology for Homo floresiensis at Liang Bua in Indonesia
Sutikna, T., Tocheri, M. W., Morwood, M. J., Saptomo, E. W., Jatmiko, Awe, R. D., Wasisto, S., Westaway, K. E., Aubert, M., Li, B., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17179 · Cited by 330
Reappraisal of the comparative cost of human locomotion using gait-specific allometric analyses.
Rubenson, J., Heliams, D. B., Maloney, S. K., Withers, P. C., Lloyd, D. G., & Fournier, P. A. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.000992 · Cited by 76
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 106
- Adamczyk, 2013, Mechanical and energetic consequences of rolling foot shape in human walking, J. Exp. Biol., 216, 2722, 10.1242/jeb.082347 · DOI · Paper page
- Alexander, 1991, Energy-saving mechanisms in walking and running, J. Exp. Biol., 69, 55, 10.1242/jeb.160.1.55 · DOI
- Bates, 2013, The evolution of compliance in the human lateral mid-foot, Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 280, 20131818, 10.1098/rspb.2013.1818 · DOI
- Behrensmeyer, 1981, Footprints of a Pleistocene hominid in northern Kenya, Nature, 289, 167, 10.1038/289167a0 · DOI
- Bennett, 1989, Elastic strain energy storage in the feet of running monkeys, J. Zool., 217, 469, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1989.tb02502.x · DOI
- Bennett, 2009, Early hominin foot morphology based on 1.5-million-year-old footprints from Ileret, Kenya, Science, 323, 1197, 10.1126/science.1168132 · DOI
- Biewener, 2004, Muscle mechanical advantage of human walking and running: implications for energy cost, J. Appl. Physiol., 97, 2266, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00003.2004 · DOI · Paper page
- Bojsen-Møller, 1979, Calcaneocuboid joint and stability of the longitudinal arch of the foot at high and low gear push off, J. Anat., 129, 165
- Bramble, 2004, Endurance running and the evolution of Homo, Nature, 432, 345, 10.1038/nature03052 · DOI
- Carrier, 2017, The effect of foot posture on capacity to apply free moments to the ground: implications for fighting performance in great apes, Biol. Open, 6, 269, 10.1242/bio.022640 · DOI
- Carrier, 1994, Variable gearing during locomotion in the human musculoskeletal system, Science, 265, 651, 10.1126/science.8036513 · DOI
- Cavagna, 1977, Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure, Am. J. Physiol., 233, R243
- Chi, 2005, Mechanical energy and effective foot mass during impact loading of walking and running, J. Biomech., 38, 1387, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.06.020 · DOI
- Clarke, 1995, Sterkfontein member 2 foot bones of the oldest South African hominid, Science, 269, 521, 10.1126/science.7624772 · DOI
- Crompton, 2008, Locomotion and posture from the common hominoid ancestor to fully modern hominins, with special reference to the last common panin/hominin ancestor, J. Anat., 212, 501, 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00870.x · DOI
- Crompton, 2012, Human-like external function of the foot, and fully upright gait, confirmed in the 3.66 million year old Laetoli hominin footprints by topographic statistics, experimental footprint-formation and computer simulation, J. R. Soc. Interface, 9, 707, 10.1098/rsif.2011.0258 · DOI
- Cunningham, 2010, The influence of foot posture on the cost of transport in humans, J. Exp. Biol., 213, 790, 10.1242/jeb.038984 · DOI
- D'Août, 2002, Segment and joint angles of hind limb during bipedal and quadrupedal walking of the bonobo (Pan paniscus), Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 119, 37, 10.1002/ajpa.10112 · DOI
- Day, 1964, Fossil foot bones, Nature, 201, 969, 10.1038/201969a0 · DOI
- Day, 1980, Laetoli Pliocene hominid footprints and bipedalism, Nature, 286, 385, 10.1038/286385a0 · DOI
- DeSilva, 2009, Functional morphology of the ankle and the likelihood of climbing in early hominins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 6567, 10.1073/pnas.0900270106 · DOI
- DeSilva, 2010, Revisiting the “midtarsal break”, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 141, 245, 10.1002/ajpa.21140 · DOI
- DeSilva, 2013, The lower limb and mechanics of walking in Australopithecus sediba, Science, 340, 1232999, 10.1126/science.1232999 · DOI
- DeSilva, 2015, Midtarsal break variation in modern humans: functional causes, skeletal correlates, and paleontological implications, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 156, 543, 10.1002/ajpa.22699 · DOI
- DeSilva, 2018, A nearly complete foot from Dikika, Ethiopia and its implications for the ontogeny and function of Australopithecus afarensis, Sci. Adv., 4, eaar7723, 10.1126/sciadv.aar7723 · DOI
- Dingwall, 2013, Hominin stature, body mass, and walking speed estimates based on 1.5 million-year-old fossil footprints at Ileret, Kenya, J. Hum. Evol., 64, 556, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.02.004 · DOI
- Donelan, 2002, Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking, J. Exp. Biol., 205, 3717, 10.1242/jeb.205.23.3717 · DOI · Paper page
- Doran, 1996, Comparative positional behavior of the African apes, 213, 10.1017/CBO9780511752414.018 · DOI
- Drapeau, 2013, Metatarsal torsion in monkeys, apes, humans and australopiths, J. Hum. Evol., 64, 93, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.10.008 · DOI
- Elftman, 1935, Chimpanzee and human feet in bipedal walking, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 20, 69, 10.1002/ajpa.1330200109 · DOI
- Elftman, 1935, The evolution of the human foot, with especial reference to the joints, J. Anat., 70, 56
- Farris, 2012, The mechanics and energetics of human walking and running: a joint level perspective, J. R. Soc. Interface, 9, 110, 10.1098/rsif.2011.0182 · DOI
- Fernández, 2016, Form and function of the human and chimpanzee forefoot: implications for early hominin bipedalism, Sci. Rep., 6, 30532, 10.1038/srep30532 · DOI
- Fernández, 2018, Evolution and function of the hominin forefoot, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 8746, 10.1073/pnas.1800818115 · DOI
- Gefen, 2001, In vivo biomechanical behavior of the human heel pad during the stnce phase of gait, J. Biomech., 34, 1661, 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00143-9 · DOI
- Gill, 2015, Skeletal development of hallucal tarsometatarsal joint curvature and angulation in extant apes and modern humans, J. Hum. Evol., 88, 137, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.07.003 · DOI
- Greiner, 2014, Kinematics of primate midfoot flexibility, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 155, 610, 10.1002/ajpa.22617 · DOI
- Griffin, 2010, Comparative in vivo forefoot kinematics of Homo sapiens and Pan paniscus, J. Hum. Evol., 59, 608, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.07.017 · DOI
- Haile-Selassie, 2012, A new hominin foot from Ethiopia shows multiple Pliocene bipedal adaptations, Nature, 483, 565, 10.1038/nature10922 · DOI
- Harcourt-Smith, 2004, Fossils, feet and the evolution of bipedal locomotion, J. Anat., 204, 403, 10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00296.x · DOI
- Harcourt-Smith, 2015, The foot of Homo naledi, Nat. Commun., 6, 8432, 10.1038/ncomms9432 · DOI
- Hatala, 2016, Laetoli footprints reveal bipedal gait biomechanics different from those of modern humans and chimpanzees, Proc. R. Soc. B, 283, 20160235, 10.1098/rspb.2016.0235 · DOI
- Hatala, 2016, Footprints reveal direct evidence of group behavior and locomotion in Homo erectus, Sci. Rep., 6, 28766, 10.1038/srep28766 · DOI
- Hicks, 1954, The mechanics of the foot. II. The plantar aponeurosis, J. Anat., 88, 25
- Hildebrand, 2001, Analysis of Vertebrate Structure
- Holowka, 2017, Chimpanzee ankle and foot joint kinematics: arboreal versus terrestrial locomotion, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 164, 131, 10.1002/ajpa.23262 · DOI
- Holowka, 2017, Chimpanzee and human midfoot motion during bipedal walking and the evolution of the longitudinal arch of the foot, J. Hum. Evol., 104, 23, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.12.002 · DOI
- Jungers, 2009, Descriptions of the lower limb skeleton of Homo floresiensis, J. Hum. Evol., 57, 538, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.08.014 · DOI
- Jungers, 2009, The foot of Homo floresiensis, Nature, 459, 81, 10.1038/nature07989 · DOI
- Kelly, 2014, Intrinsic foot muscles have the capacity to control deformation of the longitudinal arch, J. R. Soc. Interface, 11, 20131188, 10.1098/rsif.2013.1188 · DOI
- Kelly, 2015, Active regulation of longitudinal arch compression and recoil during walking and running, J. R. Soc. Interface, 12, 20141076, 10.1098/rsif.2014.1076 · DOI
- Ker, 1987, The spring in the arch of the human foot, Nature, 325, 147, 10.1038/325147a0 · DOI
- Kraft, 2014, A natural history of human tree climbing, J. Hum. Evol., 71, 105, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.02.002 · DOI
- Larson, 2009, Descriptions of the upper limb skeleton of Homo floresiensis, J. Hum. Evol., 57, 555, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.06.007 · DOI
- Latimer, 1989, The calcaneus of Australopithecus afarensis and its implications for the evolution of bipedality, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 78, 369, 10.1002/ajpa.1330780306 · DOI
- Latimer, 1990, Hallucal tarsometatarsal joint in Australopithecus afarensis, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 82, 125, 10.1002/ajpa.1330820202 · DOI
- Latimer, 1982, Hominid carpal, metacarpal, and phalangeal bones recovered from the Hadar formation: 1974-1977 collections, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 57, 701, 10.1002/ajpa.1330570412 · DOI
- Lauder, 1995, On the inference of function from structure, 1
- Leakey, 1979, Pliocene footprints in the Laetolil Beds at Laetoli, northern Tanzania, Nature, 278, 317, 10.1038/278317a0 · DOI
- Lieberman, 2010, Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners, Nature, 463, 531, 10.1038/nature08723 · DOI
- Lovejoy, 2009, Combining prehension and propulsion: the foot of Ardipithecus ramidus, Science, 326, 72e1, 10.1126/science.1175832 · DOI
- Masao, 2016, New footprints from Laetoli (Tanzania) provide evidence for marked body size variation in early hominins, Elife, 5, e19568, 10.7554/eLife.19568 · DOI
- McDonald, 2016, The role of arch compression and metatarsophalangeal joint dynamics in modulating plantar fascia strain in running, PLoS One, 11, e0152602, 10.1371/journal.pone.0152602 · DOI
- McHenry, 2006, Hallucial convergence in early hominids, J. Hum. Evol., 50, 534, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.12.008 · DOI
- McKeon, 2015, The foot core system: a new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function, Br. J. Sports Med., 49, 290, 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092690 · DOI
- Moorjani, 2016, Variation in the molecular clock of primates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 113, 10607, 10.1073/pnas.1600374113 · DOI
- Morton, 1922, Evolution of the human foot I, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 5, 305, 10.1002/ajpa.1330050409 · DOI
- Morton, 1924, Evolution of the human foot II, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 7, 1, 10.1002/ajpa.1330070114 · DOI
- O'Neill, 2015, Three-dimensional kinematics of the pelvis and hind limbs in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and human bipedal walking, J. Hum. Evol., 86, 32, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.05.012 · DOI
- Oishi, 2018, Multivariate analysis of variations in intrinsic foot musculature among hominoids, J. Anat., 232, 812, 10.1111/joa.12780 · DOI
- Pain, 2001, The role of the heel pad and shank soft tissue during impacts: a further resolution of a paradox, J. Biomech., 34, 327, 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00199-8 · DOI
- Perl, 2012, Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 44, 1335, 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318247989e · DOI
- Pilbeam, 2017, Reconstructing the last common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans, 22
- Pontzer, 2010, Locomotor anatomy and biomechanics of the Dmanisi hominins, J. Hum. Evol., 58, 492, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.03.006 · DOI
- Pontzer, 2014, Bipedal and quadrupedal locomotion in chimpanzees, J. Hum. Evol., 66, 64, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.10.002 · DOI
- Prang, 2015, Calcaneal robusticity in Plio-Pleistocene hominins: implications for locomotor diversity and phylogeny, J. Hum. Evol., 80, 135, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.09.001 · DOI
- Prang, 2015, Rearfoot posture of Australopithecus sediba and the evolution of the hominin longitudinal arch, Sci. Rep., 5, 17677, 10.1038/srep17677 · DOI
- Proctor, 2010, Brief Communication: shape analysis of the MT 1 proximal articular surface in fossil hominins and shod and unshod Homo, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 143, 631, 10.1002/ajpa.21404 · DOI
- Raichlen, 2017, Interpretation of footprints from Site S confirms human-like bipedal biomechanics in Laetoli hominins, J. Hum. Evol., 107, 134, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.04.002 · DOI
- Raven, 1936, Comparative anatomy of the sole of the foot, Am. Museum Novit., 871, 1
- Reeser, 1983, Electromyographic studies of the human foot: experimental approaches to hominid evolution, Foot Ankle, 3, 391, 10.1177/107110078300300607 · DOI
- Richmond, 2007, Biomechanics of phalangeal curvature, J. Hum. Evol., 53, 678, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.05.011 · DOI
- Roberts, 2016, Contribution of elastic tissues to the mechanics and energetics of muscle function during movement, J. Exp. Biol., 219, 266, 10.1242/jeb.124446 · DOI
- Rolian, 2009, Walking, running and the evolution of short toes in humans, J. Exp. Biol., 212, 713, 10.1242/jeb.019885 · DOI
- Schmitt, 1995, Heel contact as a function of substrate type and speed in primates, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 96, 39, 10.1002/ajpa.1330960105 · DOI
- Schultz, 1963, Relations between the lengths of the main parts of the foot skeleton in primates, Folia Primatol., 1, 150, 10.1159/000165791 · DOI
- Stearne, 2016, The foot's arch and the energetics of human locomotion, Sci. Rep., 6, 19403, 10.1038/srep19403 · DOI
- Susman, 1982, Functional morphology of Homo habilis, Science, 217, 931, 10.1126/science.217.4563.931 · DOI
- Susman, 1984, Arboreality and bipedality in the Hadar hominids, Folia Primatol. (Basel)., 43, 113, 10.1159/000156176 · DOI
- Takahashi, 2017, Energy neutral: the human foot and ankle subsections combine to produce near zero net mechanical work during walking, Sci. Rep., 7, 15404, 10.1038/s41598-017-15218-7 · DOI
- Trinkaus, 1996, Neandertal pedal proximal phalanges: diaphyseal loading patterns, J. Hum. Evol., 30, 399, 10.1006/jhev.1996.0035 · DOI
- Usherwood, 2012, The human foot and heel–sole–toe walking strategy: a mechanism enabling an inverted pendular gait with low isometric muscle force?, J. R. Soc. Interface, 9, 2396, 10.1098/rsif.2012.0179 · DOI
- Venkadesan, 2017, Stiffness of the human foot and evolution of the transverse arch, arXiv
- Venkataraman, 2013, Tree climbing and human evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 1237, 10.1073/pnas.1208717110 · DOI
- Vereecke, 2008, The mechanics of the gibbon foot and its potential for elastic energy storage during bipedalism, J. Exp. Biol., 211, 3661, 10.1242/jeb.018754 · DOI
- Vereecke, 2003, Dynamic plantar pressure distribution during terrestrial locomotion of bonobos (Pan paniscus), Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 120, 373, 10.1002/ajpa.10163 · DOI
- Wager, 2016, Elastic energy within the human plantar aponeurosis contributes to arch shortening during the push-off phase of running, J. Biomech., 49, 704, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.023 · DOI
- Ward, 2011, Complete fourth metatarsal and arches in the foot of Australopithecus afarensis, Science, 331, 750, 10.1126/science.1201463 · DOI
- Webber, 2016, The role of plantigrady and heel-strike in the mechanics and energetics of human walking with implications for the evolution of the human foot, J. Exp. Biol., 219, 3729, 10.1242/jeb.138610 · DOI · Paper page
- Whittle, 1999, Generation and attenuation of transient impulsive forces beneath the foot: a review, Gait Posture, 10, 264, 10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00041-7 · DOI
- Wunderlich, 2017, Foot use during vertical climbing in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), J. Hum. Evol., 109, 1, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.04.006 · DOI
- Yawar, 2017, Contribution of the transverse arch to foot stiffness in humans
- Zelik, 2016, A unified perspective on ankle push-off in human walking, J. Exp. Biol., 219, 3676, 10.1242/jeb.140376 · DOI
- Zelik, 2018, Ankle and foot power in gait analysis: implications for science, technology and clinical assessment, J. Biomech, 75, 1, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.017 · DOI
- Zelik, 2015, Six degree-of-freedom analysis of hip, knee, ankle and foot provides updated understanding of biomechanical work during human walking, J. Exp. Biol., 218, 876, 10.1242/jeb.115451 · DOI
- Zipfel, 2011, The foot and ankle of Australopithecus sediba, Science, 333, 1417, 10.1126/science.1202703 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Forest terrains influence walking kinematics among indigenous Tsimane of the Bolivian Amazon
Holowka, N. B., Kraft, T. S., Wallace, I. J., Gurven, M., & Venkataraman, V. V. (2022) · Evolutionary Human Sciences · doi:10.1017/ehs.2022.13 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Holowka, N. B., & Lieberman, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 11 Divinity Ave, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2018-09-01
- Volume
- 221
- Issue
- 17
- ISSN
- 1477-9145
- 0022-0949
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Leakey Foundation
- Wenner-Gren Foundation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review