The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New paradigms for modelling species distributions?
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The management of both desirable and undesirable species requires an understanding of the factors determining their distribution. Quantitative distribution models offer simple methods for formulating the species–habitat link and the means not only for predicting where species should occur, but also for understanding the factors involved. Generalized linear modelling, in particular, links the incidence of species to habitat variables, and has increasingly formed the backbone of the modelling approaches used. New ‘data technologies’, such as remote sensing and geographical information systems, have further broadened these modelling applications to almost any ecological system and any species for which there are distribution data. Many previous approaches have aimed to identify the most parsimonious model with the best suite of predictors, selected on the basis of null hypothesis testing. However, information‐theoretic approaches based on Akaike's information criterion allow the selection of a best approximating model or a subset of models from a set of candidates. Information‐theoretic approaches require a deeper understanding of the biology of the system modelled and may well become an improved paradigm for species distribution modelling. Synthesis and applications. This special profile of six papers demonstrates the development in methodology used in species distribution modelling. The papers show how information‐theoretic approaches can be coupled with emerging data technologies to address issues of conservation significance. With conservation biology and applied ecology at the forefront of many of the basic science developments so far, we expect these methods to pervade other areas of ecological research more fully in future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models
FIELDING, A. H., & BELL, J. F. (1997) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892997000088 · Cited by 6,956
Model Selection and Multimodel Inference
(2003) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2003.s146 · Cited by 5,449
Turner, B. D., & Crawley, M. J. (1994) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261403 · Cited by 2,074
Evaluating presence–absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence
Manel, S., Williams, H. C., & Ormerod, S. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00647.x · Cited by 1,759
Self-citationEngler, R., Guisan, A., & Rechsteiner, L. (2004) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00881.x · Cited by 960
Moore, L. M. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484778 · Cited by 728
An Autologistic Model for the Spatial Distribution of Wildlife.
Augustin, N. H., Mugglestone, M. A., & Buckland, S. T. (1996) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404755 · Cited by 647
Modelling landscape‐scale habitat use using GIS and remote sensing: a case study with great bustards
Osborne, P. E., Alonso, J. C., & Bryant, R. G. (2001) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00604.x · Cited by 561
Johnson, C. J., Seip, D. R., & Boyce, M. S. (2004) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00899.x · Cited by 375
Cited by
Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data
Elith*, J., H. Graham*, C., P. Anderson, R., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., J. Hijmans, R., Huettmann, F., R. Leathwick, J., Lehmann, A., et al. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · Cited by 9,088
ALLOUCHE, O., TSOAR, A., & KADMON, R. (2006) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x · Cited by 5,172
Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models
Wisz, M. S., Hijmans, R. J., Li, J., Peterson, A. T., Graham, C. H., Guisan, A., & NCEAS Predicting Species Distributions Working Group (2008) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00482.x · Cited by 2,514
Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour?
WHITTINGHAM, M. J., STEPHENS, P. A., BRADBURY, R. B., & FRECKLETON, R. P. (2006) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01141.x · Cited by 1,520
Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either–or presence–absence
Jiménez-Valverde, A., & Lobo, J. M. (2007) · Acta Oecologica · doi:10.1016/j.actao.2007.02.001 · Cited by 892
Metadata
- Authors
- Rushton, S. P., Ormerod, S. J., & Kerby, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-200
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2095240644
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 31.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New paradigms for modelling species distributions? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00903.x
- The paper
- Rushton, S. P., Ormerod, S. J., & Kerby, G. (2004). New paradigms for modelling species distributions? Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00903.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.