The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE Si:C:N RATIO OF MARINE DIATOMS: INTERSPECIFIC VARIABILITY AND THE EFFECT OF SOME ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES1
Abstract
The variability of marine diatom Si:C and Si:N composition ratios was examined to assess their utility as ecological conversion factors. Twenty‐seven diatom species grown under an 18:6 h LD cycle and sampled at the end of the light period gave mean ratios, by atoms, of 0.13 ± 0.04 and 1.12 ± 0.33 for Si:C and Si:N ratios, respectively (95% C.I. reported). The mean ratios for 18 species grown under continuous illumination were 0.12 ± 0.03 for Si:C and 0.95 ± 0.23 for Si:N. The mean ratios of the clones grown under constant light were not statistically different from those calculated for the same species grown under an 18:6 h LD photoperiod. The overall mean Si:C and Si:N ratios for the 18:6 h LD and continuous light experiments taken together, weighted by the number of species in each experiment, are 0.13 and 1.05, respectively. The average ratios for the nine nanoplankton species (<20 μm) examined were 0.09 ± 0.03 for Si:C and 0.80 ± 0.35 for Si:N. The eighteen netplankton species (>20 μm) had higher mean ratios, Si:C = 0.15 ± 0.04 and Si:N = 1.20 ± 0.37. Time course sampling throughout a 24 h period revealed twofold variations in both ratios for individual species grown on a 14:10 h LD cycle. Changes in irradiance can also produce factor of two variations, both ratios being higher under low light. Comparisons of these data with those from the literature regarding the effects of temperature and nutrient limitation on diatom elemental composition suggest that use of these ratios to convert field estimates of biogenic silica into nitrogen or carbon units, or to estimate silica production from 14 C data, should yield results accurate to within a factor of three under most circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Upper ocean ecosystem dynamics and iron cycling in a global three-dimensional model
Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., & Lindsay, K. (2004) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002220 · Cited by 889
Chai, F., Dugdale, R. C., Peng, T.-H., Wilkerson, F. P., & Barber, R. T. (2002) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/s0967-0645(02)00055-3 · Cited by 295
Jin, X., Gruber, N., Dunne, J. P., Sarmiento, J. L., & Armstrong, R. A. (2006) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2005gb002532 · Cited by 250
Hattenrath-Lehmann, T. K., Marcoval, M. A., Mittlesdorf, H., Goleski, J. A., Wang, Z., Haynes, B., Morton, S. L., & Gobler, C. J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124148 · Cited by 67
Wallace, R. B., & Gobler, C. J. (2015) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-014-9818-1 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Brzezinski, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Phycology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347-357
- ISSN
- 0022-3646 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-8817
- OpenAlex
- W2099290206
- Cited by
- 1,329
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE Si:C:N RATIO OF MARINE DIATOMS: INTERSPECIFIC VARIABILITY AND THE EFFECT OF SOME ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1985.00347.x
- The paper
- Brzezinski, M. A. (1985). THE Si:C:N RATIO OF MARINE DIATOMS: INTERSPECIFIC VARIABILITY AND THE EFFECT OF SOME ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES1. Journal of Phycology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1985.00347.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.