Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CARBON UPTAKE IN A MARINE DIATOM DURING ACUTE EXPOSURE TO ULTRAVIOLET B RADIATION: RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF DAMAGE AND REPAIR1

Lesser, Michael P., Cullen, John J., Neale, Patrick J.·1994·Journal of Phycology

Abstract

Experiments on a marine diatom, Thalassiosira pseudonana (Hustedt) clone 3H, demonstrate that under moderate photon flux densities (75 μmol quanta·m−2·s−1) of visible light the inhibition of photosynthesis by supplemental ultraviolet (UV) radiation (UV‐B: 280–320 nm) is well described as a hyperbolic function of UV‐B irradiance for time scales of 0.5–4 h. Results are consistent with predictions of a recently developed model of photosynthesis under the influence of UV and visible irradiance. Although net destruction of chlorophyll occurs during a 4‐h exposure to UV‐B, and the effect is a function of exposure, the principal effect of UV‐B is a decrease in chlorophyll‐specific photosynthetic rate. The dependence of photoinhibition on dosage rate, rather than cumulative dose, and the hyperbolic shape of the relationship are consistent with net photoinhibition being an equilibrium between damage and repair. The ratio of damage to repair is estimated by a mathematical analysis of the inhibition of photosynthesis during exposures to UV‐B. A nitrate‐limited culture was much more sensitive to UV‐B than were the nutrient‐replete cultures, but the kinetics of photoinhibition were similar. The analysis suggests that the nutrient‐limited culture was more sensitive than the nutrient‐replete cultures because repair or turnover of critical proteins associated with photosynthesis is inhibited. An inhibitor of chloroplast protein synthesis was used to suppress repair processes. Photoinhibition by UV‐B was enhanced, and inhibition was a function of cumulative dose, as would be expected if damage were not countered by repair. The fundamental importance of repair processes should be considered in the design of field experiments and models of UV‐B effects in the environment, especially in the context of vertical mixing. Repair processes must also be considered whenever biological weighting functions are developed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1994.00183.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lesser, M. P., Cullen, J. J., & Neale, P. J.
Venue
Journal of Phycology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
183-192
ISSN
  • 0022-3646 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-8817
OpenAlex
W2036743647
Cited by
179
References
2
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CARBON UPTAKE IN A MARINE DIATOM DURING ACUTE EXPOSURE TO ULTRAVIOLET B RADIATION: RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF DAMAGE AND REPAIR1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1994.00183.x
The paper
Lesser, M. P., Cullen, J. J., & Neale, P. J. (1994). CARBON UPTAKE IN A MARINE DIATOM DURING ACUTE EXPOSURE TO ULTRAVIOLET B RADIATION: RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF DAMAGE AND REPAIR1. Journal of Phycology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1994.00183.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.