Cited by 584EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLanguage Development and DisordersSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Psychological Constraints on the Teachability of Languages

Pienemann, Manfred·1984·Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Abstract

This paper reports on the influence of formal instruction on L2 acquisition in an instructional experiment with child learners. The main tendency of the findings is that a structure can only be learned under instruction if the learner's interlanguage has already reached a stage one step prior to the acquisition of the structure to be taught. My hypothesis for an explanation suggests that the teachability of L2 structures is constrained by the same processing restrictions that determine the developmental sequences of natural L2 acquisition: since the processing procedures of each stage build upon the procedures of the preceding stage there is no way to leave out a stage of the developmental sequence by the means of formal teaching. Following such a processing capacity approach I reject the assumption that the constraints on teachability can be explained on the basis of linguistic input.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263100005015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teachability is constrained by learnability.

    “work by Pienemann (1984 and elsewhere), Mackey (1995), and others suggests that teachability is constrained by learnability.”

    From Focus on Form in Task-based Language Teaching (2000) · cites this paper as Pienemann (1984 and elsewhere)

  • Processability determines learnability, and learnability determines teachability.

    “In Pienemann's terms, processability determines learnability, and learnability determines teachability (Pienemann, 1984).”

    From In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues (2016) · cites this paper as Pienemann, 1984

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pienemann, M.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Pienemann, Manfred
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Published
1984
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
186-214
ISSN
  • 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1545
OpenAlex
W2130119124
Cited by
584
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 25
FWCI
17.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
formal instruction, interlanguage, developmental sequence, processing constraints, stages of language acquisition, language input, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review