Psychological Constraints on the Teachability of Languages
Abstract
This paper reports on the influence of formal instruction on L2 acquisition in an instructional experiment with child learners. The main tendency of the findings is that a structure can only be learned under instruction if the learner's interlanguage has already reached a stage one step prior to the acquisition of the structure to be taught. My hypothesis for an explanation suggests that the teachability of L2 structures is constrained by the same processing restrictions that determine the developmental sequences of natural L2 acquisition: since the processing procedures of each stage build upon the procedures of the preceding stage there is no way to leave out a stage of the developmental sequence by the means of formal teaching. Following such a processing capacity approach I reject the assumption that the constraints on teachability can be explained on the basis of linguistic input.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachability is constrained by learnability.
“work by Pienemann (1984 and elsewhere), Mackey (1995), and others suggests that teachability is constrained by learnability.”
From Focus on Form in Task-based Language Teaching (2000) · cites this paper as Pienemann (1984 and elsewhere)
Processability determines learnability, and learnability determines teachability.
“In Pienemann's terms, processability determines learnability, and learnability determines teachability (Pienemann, 1984).”
From In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues (2016) · cites this paper as Pienemann, 1984
Cites
Does Second Language Instruction Make a Difference? A Review of Research
Long, M. H. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586253 · Cited by 573 · cited 3× · see citing works
“However, on the basis of a review of 13 empirical studies Long (1982) points out that in systematizing these studies according to the absolute and relative effect of input and to the amount of natural versus formal input, a general tendency can be found which indicates a positive effect of instruction for L2 acquisiti…”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,414 · see citing works
Three Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587368 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Focus on Form in Task-based Language Teaching
Long, M. (2000) · Language Policy and Pedagogy · doi:10.1075/z.96.11lon · Cited by 440 · see citing works
In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Long, M. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000057 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Consciousness in second language acquisition: A review of field studies and laboratory experiments
Ellis, N. C. (1995) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.1995.9959876 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pienemann, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Pienemann, Manfred
- ORCID
- Pienemann, Manfred
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1984
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-214
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2130119124
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 17.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- formal instruction, interlanguage, developmental sequence, processing constraints, stages of language acquisition, language input, second language acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review