The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Race/Ethnic Differences in Nonspecific Psychological Distress: Evidence from the National Health Interview Survey*
Abstract
Objective. This article documents the patterns of white‐nonwhite differences in nonspecific psychological distress and explores how acculturation characteristics, social class, marital status, and chronic illness mediate or moderate these differences for eight racial/ethnic populations in the United States. Methods. We analyze data from a five‐year pool of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) collected between 1997 and 2001 (N=162,032) and employ multivariate regression techniques to explore level of psychological distress of various ethnic groups relative to non‐Hispanic whites. Results. Nonwhite populations exhibit variable base‐line differences in psychological distress compared to non‐Hispanic whites; however, adjusted estimates show that African Americans and Mexicans have lower levels of distress while distress scores for “other Hispanics,” Asians, and Cubans exhibit statistically similar levels. The highest distress occurs for Puerto Ricans. Interaction models reveal chronic sources of stress (e.g., poverty, chronic illness, nonmarriage) are even more taxing on psychological health of high‐risk groups or have weaker relationships to stress for other groups. Conclusions. This study reveals the need for capturing ethnic variation in studies of mental health. Social class, acculturation, marital status, and chronic illness cannot fully explain white‐nonwhite differences in psychological distress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
KESSLER, R. C., ANDREWS, G., COLPE, L. J., HIRIPI, E., MROCZEK, D. K., NORMAND, S.-L. T., WALTERS, E. E., & ZASLAVSKY, A. M. (2002) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291702006074 · Cited by 10,327
US Socioeconomic and Racial Differences in Health: Patterns and Explanations
Williams, D. R., & Collins, C. (1995) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.002025 · Cited by 1,718
Sociological Perspectives on American Indians
Snipp, C. M. (1992) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002031 · Cited by 142
Cited by
Epidemiology of Psychological Distress
Drapeau, A., Marchand, A., & Beaulieu-Prevost, D. (2012) · Mental Illnesses - Understanding, Prediction and Control · doi:10.5772/30872 · Cited by 472
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_25 · Cited by 269
Mezuk, B., Abdou, C. M., Hudson, D., Kershaw, K. N., Rafferty, J. A., Lee, H., & Jackson, J. S. (2013) · Society and Mental Health · doi:10.1177/2156869313480892 · Cited by 231
Barnes, D. M., & Bates, L. M. (2017) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1394-9 · Cited by 193
Mouzon, D. M., Taylor, R. J., Nguyen, A. W., & Chatters, L. M. (2016) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcop.21800 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Bratter, J. L., & Eschbach, K.
- Venue
- Social Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 620-644
- ISSN
- 0038-4941 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6237
- OpenAlex
- W2116279973
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race/Ethnic Differences in Nonspecific Psychological Distress: Evidence from the National Health Interview Survey*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00321.x
- The paper
- Bratter, J. L., & Eschbach, K. (2005). Race/Ethnic Differences in Nonspecific Psychological Distress: Evidence from the National Health Interview Survey*. Social Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00321.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.