CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dendritic cells, DRiPs, and DALIS in the control of antigen processing

Pierre, Philippe·2005·Immunological Reviews
DOI 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00300.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Summary: The study of the cell biology of antigen processing and presentation has greatly contributed to our understanding of the immune response. The work of many immunologically inclined cell biologists has also permitted new insights into cellular mechanisms shared by many cell types. Here are described recent and particularly exciting findings on the regulation of major histocompatibility complex class I‐restricted presentation in dendritic cells and their contribution to the deciphering of the cellular response to pathogen detection.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00300.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A reduction in SQSTM1 levels in NP40/Triton X-100 lysates does not necessarily indicate that SQSTM1 is degraded, because SQSTM1 aggregates are insoluble in these detergent lysis conditions.

    “However, this does not necessarily indicate that SQSTM1 is degraded, because SQSTM1 aggregates are insoluble in these detergent lysis conditions [421, 612].”

    From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [421]

  • SQSTM1 may be transcriptionally upregulated under some conditions, as observed in several C. elegans longevity models, further complicating interpretation.

    “SQSTM1 may be transcriptionally upregulated under some conditions [421, 565-568], as observed in several C. elegans longevity models [569, 570], further complicating the interpretation of results.”

    From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [421]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00449-4 · DOI
  2. 10.1084/jem.191.3.411 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00182-1 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0952-7915(00)00175-8 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0952-7915(98)80242-2 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0952-7915(00)00177-1 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/42039 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81458-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.288.5465.522 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1080106 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.1108003 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00069-3 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nri1250 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.0404740101 · DOI
  15. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064828 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/ni1090 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.90.19.9130 · DOI
  18. 10.1006/scel.1993.1007 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0065-2776(02)80012-8 · DOI
  20. 10.1172/JCI0216831 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0952-7915(02)00010-9 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00051-7 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/ni1082 · DOI
  24. 10.1091/mbc.8.10.1943 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/35008103 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/35008096 · DOI
  27. 10.1242/jcs.114.5.845 · DOI
  28. 10.4049/jimmunol.157.5.1823 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/nri1053 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s00281-004-0176-0 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0309-1651(80)90045-4 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90265-X · DOI
  33. 10.4049/jimmunol.167.9.4801 · DOI
  34. 10.1084/jem.20031219 · DOI
  35. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064819 · DOI
  36. 10.1084/jem.20031869 · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.85.7.2274 · DOI
  38. 10.1126/science.1085650 · DOI
  39. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020366 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/nature02240 · DOI
  41. 10.1126/science.1088902 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/417177a · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.04.016 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01852-3 · DOI
  45. 10.1083/jcb.153.3.449 · DOI
  46. 10.1083/jcb.200312073 · DOI
  47. 10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.2471 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0014-5793(74)80689-7 · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.69.2.422 · DOI
  50. Etlinger JD, 1980, Control of protein degradation in reticulocytes and reticulocyte extracts by hemin, J Biol Chem, 255, 4563, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)85530-8 · DOI
  51. 10.1083/jcb.146.1.113 · DOI
  52. 10.1084/jem.143.5.1283 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/nature01912 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/nature01911 · DOI
  55. 10.1073/pnas.1735556100 · DOI
  56. 10.1084/jem.20021542 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/eji.200324508 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/ni989 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00142.x · DOI
  60. 10.1074/jbc.M101968200 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/S0968-0004(02)02125-4 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00644-3 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/35050509 · DOI
  64. 10.1073/pnas.202365899 · DOI
  65. 10.1074/jbc.M204196200 · DOI
  66. 10.1083/jcb.151.1.167 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.molcel.2003.08.009 · DOI
  68. 10.1126/science.1068408 · DOI
  69. 10.1093/embo-reports/kvd052 · DOI
  70. 10.1242/jcs.115.16.3227 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pierre, P.
Venue
Immunological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-23
Volume
207
Issue
1
Pages
184-190
ISSN
  • 0105-2896
  • 1600-065X
DOI
10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00300.x
Cited by
41
References
1
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review