The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the Performance of Ethical and Non‐ethical Funds: A Matched Pair Analysis
Abstract
Abstract: This paper studies the performance of 60 European funds from four countries. The paper extends the UK matched pair approach for fund evaluation developed by Mallin et al. (1995) to a European setting. The findings suggest that there is no difference between ethical and non‐ethical funds according to the performance measures employed. Neither type of fund displayed any ability to time the market. Finally, the results indicate that the management fee is a significant explanatory variable for the Jensen measure as Chen et al. (1992) and Grinblatt and Titman (1994) suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Carhart, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x · Cited by 17,283
Sharpe, W. F. (1966) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/294846 · Cited by 3,937
Cited by
The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds
Zerbib, O. D. (2019) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012 · Cited by 1,379
The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance
Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2007) · European Financial Management · doi:10.1111/j.1468-036x.2007.00402.x · Cited by 851
The effect of social screening on bond mutual fund performance
Henke, H.-M. (2016) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.01.010 · Cited by 147
Responsible or Thematic? The True Nature of Sustainability-Themed Mutual Funds
Ielasi, F., & Rossolini, M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11123304 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Kreander, N., Gray, R. H., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Finance & Accounting
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 1465-1493
- ISSN
- 0306-686X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5957
- OpenAlex
- W2113102240
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
