Cited by 203Climate Change, Adaptation, MigrationDisaster Management and ResilienceEarthquake and Disaster Impact Studies

Human Vulnerability, Dislocation and Resettlement: Adaptation Processes of River‐bank Erosion‐induced Displacees in Bangladesh

Mutton, David, Haque, C. Emdad·2004·Disasters

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to identify and analyse patterns of economic and social adaptation among river‐bank erosion‐induced displacees in Bangladesh. It was hypothesised that the role of social demographic and socio‐economic variables in determining the coping ability and recovery of the river‐bank erosion‐induced displacees is quite significant. The findings of the research reveal that displacees experience substantial socio‐economic impoverishment and marginalisation as a consequence of involuntary migration. This in part is a socially constructed process, reflecting inequitable access to land and other resources. Vulnerability to disasters is further heightened by a number of identifiable social and demographic factors including gender, education and age, although extreme poverty and marginalisation create complexity to isolate the relative influence of these variables. The need to integrate hazard analysis and mitigation with the broader economic and social context is discussed. It is argued that the capacity of people to respond to environmental threats is a function of not only the physical forces which affect them, but also of underlying economic and social relationships which increase human vulnerability to risk. Hazard analysis and mitigation can be more effective when it takes into account such social and demographic and socio‐economic dimensions of disasters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00242.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparable household-level adaptation is barely possible for erosion except for deconstructing and shifting one's house shortly before erosion, a widespread strategy along the Jamuna.

    “Comparable household level adaptation is barely possible for erosion except for deconstructing and shifting one’s house shortly before it gets eroded—a widespread adaptation strategy along the Jamuna (Hutton & Haque, 2004; Mamun et al., 2022; Penning-Rowsell et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mutton, D., & Haque, C. E.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Haque, C. Emdad
Venue
Disasters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-27
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
41-62
ISSN
  • 0361-3666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7717
OpenAlex
W2051069824
Cited by
203
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disasters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Keywords
bank erosion, displacement, resettlement, human vulnerability, adaptation, coping capacity, marginalization, poverty, disaster risk, hazard analysis, hazard mitigation, social construction of vulnerability, gender, age
MeSH terms
Adult, Bangladesh, Disasters, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Refugees, Residence Characteristics, Rural Population, Social Adjustment, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Vulnerable Populations, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review