Cited by 188Flood Risk Assessment and ManagementDisaster Management and ResilienceEarthquake and Disaster Impact Studies

Flood proneness and coping strategies: the experiences of two villages in Bangladesh

Paul, Shitangsu Kumar, Routray, Jayant K.·2010·Disasters

Abstract

This paper explores peoples' indigenous survival strategies and assesses variations in people's ability to cope with floods in two flood‐prone villages in Bangladesh. It reveals that people continuously battle against flood vulnerability in accordance with their level of exposure and abilities, with varied strategies employed at different geophysical locations. The paper reports that people in an area with low flooding and with better socioeconomic circumstances are more likely to cope with impacts compared to people in areas with high and sudden flooding. Similarly, households' ability to cope varies depending on people's socioeconomic conditions, such as education, income and occupation. Although floods in Bangladesh generate socioeconomic misery and cause damage to the environment, health and infrastructure, people's indigenous coping strategies have helped them to reduce significantly their vulnerability. Such flood‐mitigating strategies should be well recognised and emphasised further via proper dissemination of information through an early‐warning system and subsequently external assistance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01139.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Populations residing next to the rivers have developed coping strategies to minimize damage from floods and erosion.

    “The populations residing next to the rivers have developed a range of coping strategies to minimize the damage resulting from floods (e.g., raising the platform of the house; Paul & Routray, 2010) and erosion (e.g., planting vegetation on the riverbank; Mamun et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paul, S. K., & Routray, J. K.
Affiliations
Asian Institute of Technology (TH)
Corresponding author
  • Paul, Shitangsu Kumar
  • Routray, Jayant K.
Venue
Disasters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-08
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
489-508
ISSN
  • 0361-3666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7717
OpenAlex
W2058006000
Cited by
188
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disasters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Asian Institute of Technology
  • Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Keywords
flood coping strategies, flood vulnerability, socioeconomic vulnerability, flood exposure, household resilience, early warning systems, disaster risk reduction, Bangladesh villages
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Bangladesh, Developing Countries, Disaster Planning, Geography, Humans, Rural Population, Socioeconomic Factors, Focus Groups, Population Groups, Floods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review