Cited by 657Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Negative Birth Experience: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a National Sample

Abstract

Background A woman's dissatisfaction with the experience of labor and birth may affect her emotional well-being and willingness to have another baby. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of a negative birth experience in a national sample. Methods A longitudinal cohort study of 2541 women recruited from all antenatal clinics in Sweden during 3 weeks spread over 1 year was conducted. Data were collected by three questionnaires, which measured women's global experience of labor and birth 1 year after the birth, and obtained information on possible risk factors during pregnancy and 2 months after the birth. Results Seven percent of the women had a negative birth experience. The following risk factors were found: (1) factors related to unexpected medical problems, such as emergency operative delivery, induction, augmentation of labor, and infant transfer to neonatal care; (2) factors related to the woman's social life, such as unwanted pregnancy and lack of support from partner; (3) factors related to the woman's feelings during labor, such as pain and lack of control; and (4) factors that may be easier to influence by the caregivers, such as insufficient time allocated to the woman's own questions at antenatal checkups, lack of support during labor, and administration of obstetric analgesia. Conclusions Many risk factors were related to unexpected medical problems and participants' social background. Of the established methods to improve women…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0270.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1996.tb00475.x · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00043-4 · DOI
  3. 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  4. 10.1192/bjp.166.4.525 · DOI
  5. Reynolds JL., 1997, Post‐traumatic stress disorder after childbirth; the phenomenon of traumatic birth, CMAJ, 156, 831
  6. 10.1016/S0887-6185(97)00041-8 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01200.x · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01393.x · DOI
  9. 10.1080/0264683031000124073 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00110-9 · DOI
  11. Howell CJ., 2002, The Cochrane Library
  12. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00012.x · DOI
  13. Peach MJ., 1991, The King Edward Memorial Hospital 1000 Mother Survey of methods of pain relief in labor, Anaesth Intensive Care, 19, 393, 10.1177/0310057X9101900316 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/nur.4770150606 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1995.tb05593.x · DOI
  16. 10.1097/00005237-199706000-00004 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(82)92691-5 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1993.tb00419.x · DOI
  19. Gagnon AJ., 2002, The Cochrane Library
  20. Hodnett ED., 2002, The Cochrane Library
  21. 10.1001/jama.288.11.1373 · DOI
  22. Hodnett ED., 2002, The Cochrane Library
  23. Hodnett ED., 2002, The Cochrane Library
  24. 10.3109/00016349409006271 · DOI
  25. 10.2307/2136353 · DOI
  26. 10.2307/2136690 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1989.tb00878.x · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1993.tb01083.x · DOI
  29. 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800108.x · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1990.tb00004.x · DOI
  31. 10.1159/000299205 · DOI
  32. 10.1097/00006199-198307000-00004 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1985.tb00952.x · DOI
  34. 2000, The National Birth Register
  35. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00223.pp.x · DOI
  36. Rothman K J, 1998, Modern Epidemiology, 275
  37. 1998, SPSS for Windows, Version 11.0
  38. 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00254.x · DOI
  39. 10.3109/01674829809025691 · DOI
  40. 10.3109/00016349709024365 · DOI
  41. 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080004315.x · DOI
  42. 10.1159/000299611 · DOI
  43. 10.1159/000299490 · DOI
  44. 10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770512.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 657

Metadata

Authors
Waldenström, U., Hildingsson, I., Rubertsson, C., & Rådestad, I.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Mälardalen University (SE)
Venue
Birth
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
17-27
ISSN
  • 0730-7659 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-536X
OpenAlex
W2065036734
Cited by
657
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 23
FWCI
18.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
negative birth experience, childbirth satisfaction, risk factors, labor induction, labor augmentation, neonatal transport, unwanted pregnancy, partner support, labor pain, prenatal care, obstetric analgesia, childbirth education, maternal emotional well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Labor, Obstetric, Longitudinal Studies, Maternal Health Services, Maternal Welfare, Mothers, Pain, Personal Satisfaction, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Sweden, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review