The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market
Open accessAbstract
This study analyzes the value created by so‐called “toolkits for user innovation and design,” a new method of integrating customers into new product development and design. Toolkits allow customers to create their own product, which in turn is produced by the manufacturer. In the present study, questions asked were (1) if customers actually make use of the solution space offered by toolkits, and, if so, (2) how much value the self‐design actually creates. In this study, a relatively simple, design‐focused toolkit was used for a set of four experiments with a total of 717 participants, 267 of whom actually created their own watches. The heterogeneity of the resulting design solutions was calculated using the entropy concept, and willingness to pay (WTP) was measured by the contingent valuation method and Vickrey auctions. Entropy coefficients showed that self‐designed watches vary quite widely. On the other hand, significant patterns still are visible despite this high level of entropy, meaning that customer preferences are highly heterogeneous and diverse in style but not completely random. It also was found that consumers are willing to pay a considerable price premium. Their WTP for a self‐designed watch exceeds the WTP for standard watches by far, even for the best‐selling standard watches of the same technical quality. On average, a 100% value increment was found for watches designed by users with the help of the toolkit. Taken together, these findings suggest that the toolkit's ability to allow customers to customize products to suit their individual preferences creates value for them in a business‐to‐consumer (B2C) setting even when only a simple toolkit is employed. Alternative explanations, implications, and necessary future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS
Vickrey, W. (1961) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x · Cited by 7,722
Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070302303001 · Cited by 1,898
Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits
von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.7.821.2817 · cited 1×
“The final section discusses the implications of the study as well as alternative explanations and future research.”
Cited by
How Brand Community Practices Create Value
Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30 · Cited by 2,444
The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love
Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002 · Cited by 1,049
The “I Designed It Myself” Effect in Mass Customization
Franke, N., Schreier, M., & Kaiser, U. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1077 · Cited by 760
Self-citationWorking consumers: the next step in marketing theory?
Cova, B., & Dalli, D. (2009) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593109338144 · Cited by 746
Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition
Leimeister, J. M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., & Krcmar, H. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222260108 · Cited by 745
Metadata
- Authors
- Franke, N., & Piller, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10-22
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 401-415
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5885
- OpenAlex
- W2099804514
- Cited by
- 791
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 42.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00094.x
- The paper
- Franke, N., & Piller, F. (2004). Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00094.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.